Rugova v. Silverstone Property Group, LLC et al
Filing
46
ORDER denying 41 Motion to Strike. This order resolves Plaintiff's request for sanctions for the alleged refusal of Defendants to appear for depositions and untimely disclosure of witnesses. The request is denied. It is evident from the tra il of correspondence that Plaintiff dropped the ball with respect to setting deposition dates, scheduling of which was to be completed by December 31, 2024, pursuant to the Court's order dated December 19, 2024. (See, e.g., Dkt. 44 Ex. A.) Fu rther, there was no untimely disclosure of witnesses, as Defendants had disclosed Pillco and Ramdheen in mid-November 2024. And, Plaintiff already was aware of Shea Taylor, as evidenced by Plaintiff's inclusion of Taylor in Plaintiff's o wn responses to Defendants' interrogatories in August 2024. Moreover, Defendants notified Plaintiff on December 18, 2024, that defense counsel did not represent Taylor. (See Dkt. 44 Exs. A at ECF 7, G at ECF 4-5 (Interrogatory No. 7).) Inasmuc h as discovery remains open until February 20, 2025, Plaintiff nevertheless may proceed with 30(b)(6) depositions of the Defendants but may not proceed with depositions of other witnesses. The parties shall cooperate in scheduling the deposition(s) for dates and times that are mutually convenient. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the letter motion at Dkt. 41. SO ORDERED. Copies transmitted this date to all counsel of record. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger on 1/28/2025) (mml)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------X
HAXHI RUGOVA,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
- against :
:
SILVERSTONE PROPERTY GROUP, LLC,
:
and MADISON REALTY CAPITAL, L.P.,
:
:
Defendants.
:
---------------------------------------------------------------X
23-CV-2648 (RA) (RWL)
ORDER
ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER, United States Magistrate Judge.
This order resolves Plaintiff’s request for sanctions for the alleged refusal of
Defendants to appear for depositions and untimely disclosure of witnesses. The request
is denied. It is evident from the trail of correspondence that Plaintiff dropped the ball with
respect to setting deposition dates, scheduling of which was to be completed by
December 31, 2024, pursuant to the Court’s order dated December 19, 2024. (See, e.g.,
Dkt. 44 Ex. A.) Further, there was no untimely disclosure of witnesses, as Defendants
had disclosed Pillco and Ramdheen in mid-November 2024. And, Plaintiff already was
aware of Shea Taylor, as evidenced by Plaintiff’s inclusion of Taylor in Plaintiff’s own
responses to Defendants’ interrogatories in August 2024. Moreover, Defendants notified
Plaintiff on December 18, 2024, that defense counsel did not represent Taylor. (See Dkt.
44 Exs. A at ECF 7, G at ECF 4-5 (Interrogatory No. 7).) Inasmuch as discovery remains
open until February 20, 2025, Plaintiff nevertheless may proceed with 30(b)(6)
depositions of the Defendants but may not proceed with depositions of other
witnesses. The parties shall cooperate in scheduling the deposition(s) for dates and
times that are mutually convenient.
1
The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the letter motion at Dkt. 41.
SO ORDERED.
_________________________________
ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Dated: January 28, 2025
New York, New York
Copies transmitted this date to all counsel of record.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?