Washbish v. International Business Machines Corporation

Filing 19

ORDER granting #18 Letter Motion to Seal. The Respondent's request is hereby GRANTED. The parties are ORDERED to submit a proposed briefing schedule as to the sealing issue on or by May 12, 2023. IT IS SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 5/9/2023) (ks)

Download PDF
JONES DAY 250 VESEY STREET • NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10281.1047 TELEPHONE: +1.212.326.3939 • JONE S DA Y. COM Direct Number: 212.326.8338 mwlampe@jonesday.com May 9, 2023 USDCSDNY CM/ECF DOCUME ELEC:, RO 1CALL Y FILED Hon. Andrew L. Carter Jr. United States District Court Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square, Room 435 New York, NY 10007 Re: - -- - - ~- DO #: DATE FILED: 5/9/2023 _ _ _ __ Gail Washbish v. International Business Machines Corp., No. 23-CV-03013 Dear Judge Carter: I am writing on behalf of Respondent International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”) to request leave to provisionally file a public, redacted version of its Opposition to Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate (ECF No. 3) (due May 11, 2023), as well as a sealed, unredacted version for the Court. IBM also requests leave to defer briefing regarding the propriety of the sealing of the redacted portions of the vacatur briefing until such briefing is complete. IBM recognizes that Your Honor typically requires parties to file proposed sealed documents contemporaneously with their motions to seal. (Individual Practices, Rule 6(C)(ii).) But in the interest of judicial efficiency, IBM asks the Court to provisionally seal the vacatur briefing record in advance, and allow the parties to brief the sealing issues after the vacatur briefing is complete. This case stems from an arbitrator’s dismissal of Petitioner’s federal age-discrimination claim as untimely. IBM’s position is that, under the parties’ agreement, references to the arbitration proceeding and award must be sealed. With that in mind, on April 10, 2023, Petitioner moved to provisionally seal unredacted versions of her Petition and Motion to Vacate, along with the attached exhibits. (ECF No. 4.) She also noted that “[t]he parties dispute whether these materials should ultimately be filed as a matter of public record or sealed based on the confidentiality provision in IBM’s arbitration agreement.” (Id. at 1.) IBM intends to oppose this position and file briefing in support of its view that documents related to the arbitration proceeding should remain sealed. AMSTERDAM • ATLANTA • BEIJING • BOSTON • BRISBANE • BRUSSELS • CHICAGO • CLEVELAND • COLUMBUS • DALLAS • DETROIT DUBAI • DÜSSELDORF • FRANKFURT • HO NG KO NG • HOUSTON • IRVINE • LO NDON • LOS ANGELES • MADRID • MELBOURNE MEXICO CITY • MIAMI • MILAN • MINNEAPOLIS • MUNICH • NEW YORK • PARIS • PERTH • PITTSBURGH • SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO SÃO PAULO • SAUDI ARABIA • SHANGHAI • SILICON VALLEY • SINGAPORE • SYDNEY • TAIPEI • TOKYO • WASHINGTON JONES DAY Hon. Andrew L. Ouier Jr. May 9, 2023 Page 2 of2 To avoid three rounds of briefing addressing each of the pa1i ies ' briefs and exhibits and whether they should be sealed, IBM requests th at the Comi provisionally seal the vacatur briefing record but require that redacted versions be publicly filed. Petitioner would not need to file another motion to provisionally seal her anticipated reply brief in support of her vacatur motion. Instead, after Petitioner's vacatur motion is fully briefed, the paiiies would brief the sealing issue. Petitioner consents to this request, and the paiiies will confer on a briefing schedule an d submit it for the Comi's consideration if Your Honor agrees to defer the sealing briefing until after merits briefing is complete. If this request meets Your Honor 's approval, IBM provided a "So Ordered" line below for the Comi's convenience. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully submitted, Isl Matthew W. Lampe cc: Shannon Liss-Riordan Matthew W. Lampe The Respondent's request is hereby GRANTED . The paiiies are ORDERED to submit a proposed briefing schedule as to the sealing issue on or by May 12, 2023. IT IS SO ORDERED. May 9, 2023 DATED: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Hon. Andrew L. Caiier Jr. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?