Noel v. The City of New York et al
Filing
86
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court is in receipt of a joint letter filed by Defendant on behalf of the parties informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle. [ECF No. 85]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above- captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore t he action is made by February 27, 2025. If no such application is made by that date, today's dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). SO ORDERED. ( Motions due by 2/27/2025.) (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 1/28/2025) (tg)
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 1/28/2025
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
GORDON NOEL,
Plaintiff,
23-cv-3082 (MKV)
-againstORDER OF DISMISSAL
THE CITY OF NEW YORK,
Defendant.
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge:
The Court is in receipt of a joint letter filed by Defendant on behalf of the parties informing
the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle. [ECF No. 85]. Accordingly, IT
IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party
and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to
memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made
by February 27, 2025. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action
is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).
SO ORDERED.
Date: January 28, 2025
New York, NY
_________________________________
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?