Doheny v. International Business Machines, Corp. et al

Filing 24

ORDER: As discussed at yesterday's conference, Defendants' deadline to respond to the amended complaint remains June 30, 2023. Plaintiffs' oppositions to the anticipated motions to dismiss are now due July 21, 2023, and are not to exceed 25 pages in length. Defendants' replies, if any, are due July 28, 2023, and are not to exceed 10 pages in length. In addition, Defendants' oppositions to Plaintiffs' motion for issuance of notice are due July 21, 2023, and are not to exceed 20 pages in length. Plaintiffs' reply briefs are due July 28, 2023, and are not to exceed 10 pages in length. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 6/13/2023) (ras)

Case 1:23-cv-03962-RA-SN Document 24 Filed 06/14/23 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------------------X

6/14/2023

MARYKATHRYN DOHENY, et al.,
23-CV-03962 (RA)(SN)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER

-againstINTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES,
CORP, et al.
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge:

As discussed at yesterday’s conference, Defendants’ deadline to respond to the amended
complaint remains June 30, 2023. Plaintiffs’ oppositions to the anticipated motions to dismiss are
now due July 21, 2023, and are not to exceed 25 pages in length. Defendants’ replies, if any, are
due July 28, 2023, and are not to exceed 10 pages in length.
In addition, Defendants’ oppositions to Plaintiffs’ motion for issuance of notice are due
July 21, 2023, and are not to exceed 20 pages in length. Plaintiffs’ reply briefs are due July 28,
2023, and are not to exceed 10 pages in length.
SO ORDERED.

DATED:

June 14, 2023
New York, New York

SARAH NETBURN
United States Magistrate Judge