Reyes De Paulino v. Extended At Home Care, Inc

Filing 64

ORDER It has been reported to the Court that this Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") case has been settled. No later than November 6, 2024, the parties shall submit a joint letter setting forth their views as to why their settlement is f air and reasonable and should be approved, accompanied by all necessary supporting materials, including contemporaneous billing records for the attorneys fees and costs provided for in the settlement agreement. In light of the presumption of publi c access attaching to judicial documents, see Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119 (2d Cir. 2006), the parties are advised that materials on which the Court relies in making its fairness determination will be placed on the public docket, see Wolinsky v. Scholastic Inc., No. 11-CV-5917 (JMF), 2012 WL 2700381, at *37 (S.D.N.Y. July 5, 2012). The parties are advised, however, that the Court will not approve of settlement agreements in which: (a) Plaintiffs "waive pract ically any possible claim against the defendants, including unknown claims and claims that have no relationship whatsoever to wage-and-hour issues," Gurung v. White Way Threading LLC, 226 F. Supp. 3d 226, 228 (S.D.N.Y. 2016) (internal quotati on marks omitted); and (b) Plaintiffs are bar[red] from making any negative statement about the defendants," unless the settlement agreement include[s] a carve-out for truthful statements about [P]laintiffs' experience litigating their case, Lazaro-Garcia v. Sengupta Food Servs., No. 15 Civ. 4259 (RA), 2015 WL 9162701, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 15, 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 9/24/2024) (jca)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK APOLONIA REYES DE PAULINO, both individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated persons, Plaintiff, v. No. 23-CV-4199 (RA) EXTENDED AT HOME CARE, EXTENDED NURSING PERSONNEL CHAA, LLC, and EXTENDED HOLDING COMPANY, LLC, d/b/a EXTENDING AT HOME CARE, EXTENDED HOMECARE, and EXTENDED HOME CARE, ORDER Defendants. RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: It has been reported to the Court that this Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) case has been settled. No later than November 6, 2024, the parties shall submit a joint letter setting forth their views as to why their settlement is fair and reasonable and should be approved, accompanied by all necessary supporting materials, including contemporaneous billing records for the attorney’s fees and costs provided for in the settlement agreement. In light of the presumption of public access attaching to “judicial documents,” see Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119 (2d Cir. 2006), the parties are advised that materials on which the Court relies in making its fairness determination will be placed on the public docket, see Wolinsky v. Scholastic Inc., No. 11CV-5917 (JMF), 2012 WL 2700381, at *3–7 (S.D.N.Y. July 5, 2012). The parties are advised, however, that the Court will not approve of settlement agreements in which: (a) Plaintiffs “waive practically any possible claim against the defendants, including unknown claims and claims that have no relationship whatsoever to wage-and-hour issues,” Gurung v. White Way Threading LLC, 226 F. Supp. 3d 226, 228 (S.D.N.Y. 2016) (internal quotation marks omitted); and (b) Plaintiffs are “bar[red] from making any negative statement about the defendants,” unless the settlement agreement “include[s] a carve-out for truthful statements about [P]laintiffs’ experience litigating their case,” LazaroGarcia v. Sengupta Food Servs., No. 15 Civ. 4259 (RA), 2015 WL 9162701, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 15, 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted). SO ORDERED. Dated: September 24, 2024 New York, New York Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?