Ocampo et al v. Giorgio's of Gramercy Inc. et al
ORDER: granting 24 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. Application GRANTED. By Wednesday, December 20, 2023, the parties shall submit their Offer of Judgment and acceptance pursuant to Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 24. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jennifer H. Rearden on 11/15/2023) (ama)
Document 24 Filed 11/14/23 Page 1 of 1
CSM LEGAL, P.C.
Employment and Litigation Attorneys
e , Suite 45
60 E. 42nd Stre
k, New York 10165
Telephone: (212) 317-1200
Facsimile: (212) 317-1620
November 14, 2023
Hon. Jennifer H. Rearden, U.S.D.J.
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
500 Pearl Street, Room 1340
New York, New York 10007
Ocampo et al. V Giorgio's of Gramercy Inc. et al.; 23-cv-04255 JHR
We represent Plaintiff in this matter. We write to advise the Court that the parties have
agreed to resolve this case through a Rule 68 Offer of Judgment (the “Offer”) pursuant to Mei Xing
Yu v. Hasaki Rest., Inc., 944 F.3d 395, 414 (2d Cir. 2019). The parties anticipate they will be in a
position to submit the Offer and acceptance to the Court within thirty days. As such, the parties
respectfully request that the deadline to submit settlement papers to the Court, currently scheduled
for November 16, 2023, be converted to a deadline to submit the Offer, and be extended by thirty
days to December 20, 2023. This is first request of its kind and is submitted with the consent of
Application GRANTED. By Wednesday, December 20, 2023, the
parties shall submit their Offer of Judgment and acceptance pursuant to
Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of Court is
directed to terminate ECF No. 24. SO ORDERED.
ennifer H. Rearden, U.S.D.J.
ted: November 15, 2023
Certified as a minority-owned business in the State of New York
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?