Newby v. Mays et al
Filing
74
PRETRIAL ORDER: As discussed on the record during the November 21, 2024 conference, the deadline for expert discovery is hereby EXTENDED to December 23, 2024, for the limited purpose of permitting the United States to take Dr. Daly's deposition regarding his expected testimony concerning plaintiff Newby. No later than January 13, 2025, the parties must file on ECF their proposed Joint Pretrial Order (JPTO) in accordance with this Court's Individual Rules of Practice, and email a courte sy copy of the JPTO, in Word format, to chambers (Moses_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov). Any motions to exclude evidence at trial must be filed no later than February 3, 2025, and must include copies of the challenged exhibits or testimony. Res ponses must be filed no later than February 10, 2025. The parties must appear for a final pretrial conference on February 24, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. Each party's principal trial counsel must attend, must be prepared to discuss any remaining pretri al matters, and must be fully informed as to the availability of that party's witnesses during the week of March 3, 2025, including any potential scheduling difficulties. Trial. Trial will commence on March 3, 2025, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom 2 0A at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY10007. The parties must bring their original pre-marked exhibits with them to trial, and plaintiffs must be prepared to call their first witness that morning. (Expert Discovery due by 12/23/2024., Motions due by 2/3/2025., Proposed Pretrial Order due by 1/13/2025., Responses due by 2/10/2025, Bench Trial set for 3/3/2025 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 20A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Magistra te Judge Barbara C. Moses., Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/24/2025 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 20A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 11/22/2024) (sgz)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
11/22/2024
RAYLANDO D. NEWBY,
Plaintiff,
-against-
23-CV-4780 (BCM)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant
SIDEKE FOGO,
PRETRIAL ORDER
Plaintiff,
-againstUNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
BARBARA MOSES, United States Magistrate Judge.
The following schedule shall control the remaining proceedings in these consolidated
actions:
1.
Expert Discovery. As discussed on the record during the November 21, 2024 conference,
the deadline for expert discovery is hereby EXTENDED to December 23, 2024, for the
limited purpose of permitting the United States to take Dr. Daly's deposition regarding his
expected testimony concerning plaintiff Newby. Because Newby did not disclose Dr. Daly
as an expert witness until long after the deadline for such disclosures expired (see Dkt. 53),
and because the delay was not "substantially justified," Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c)(1), plaintiff
Newby must bear the costs of the deposition, including any witness fee. See Fed. R. Civ.
P. 37(c)(1)(A).
2.
Settlement. Within two weeks of the date of this order, the parties must meet and confer in
real time (e.g., in person or by telephone) for at least 30 minutes to discuss settlement.
Plaintiffs must make concrete settlement demands, and all parties must be prepared to
discuss the settlement value of this action realistically and in good faith. No later than
December 23, 2024, the parties must file a joint status letter confirming that the required
conference took place and advising the Court whether a judicially-supervised settlement
conference would be productive. If the parties wish to be referred to a different magistrate
judge for that purpose, they shall so state.
3.
Joint Pretrial Order. No later than January 13, 2025, the parties must file on ECF their
proposed Joint Pretrial Order (JPTO) in accordance with this Court's Individual Rules of
Practice, and email a courtesy copy of the JPTO, in Word format, to chambers
(Moses_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov). The parties are reminded that preparation
of the JPTO requires close cooperation between counsel, who must exchange information
and drafts well in advance of the due date in order to meet that due date. The JPTO must
include, among other things, "[a]ll stipulations or agreed statements of fact or law." Moses
Ind. Prac. § 4(b)(vii). The JPTO must also include witness lists, deposition designations,
and exhibit lists. Id. §§ 4(b)(viii)-(x). It is ordinarily the plaintiffs' responsibility to
coordinate with defendant's counsel, to file the joint document on ECF, and to advise the
Court promptly of any difficulties encountered in the preparation process.
4. Statements of the Elements or Proposed Findings. No later than February 3, 2025, each
party must file on ECF a statement of the elements of each claim, counterclaim, crossclaim, defense, or remedy involving such party (including elements as to which the parties
have agreed in the JPTO), together with a summary of the facts that will be relied upon to
establish each element and to establish that party's entitlement to damages or other relief
(including facts to which the parties have stipulated in the JPTO). In the alternative, a party
may submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, which likewise must discuss
the elements of each relevant claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, defense, and remedy. Any
party that believes it will be useful may also, by the same date, file a pretrial memorandum
of law.
5. Motions in Limine. Any motions to exclude evidence at trial must be filed no later than
February 3, 2025, and must include copies of the challenged exhibits or testimony.
Responses must be filed no later than February 10, 2025.
6. Trial Exhibits and Deposition Testimony. No later than February 17, 2025, each party
must submit to the Court two copies of a neatly tabbed binder containing:
a. A list of that party's proposed exhibits, ordered sequentially in accordance with
their pre-marked exhibit numbers,1 including a brief description of each exhibit
(e.g., "Police Report," "Photo of Damage to Car," "Treatment Records from Dr.
Smith"), a notation indicating whether any other party has raised an objection to the
exhibit, and a space for the Court to record whether and when the exhibit is admitted
into evidence;
b. Copies of that parties' proposed exhibits,2 pre-marked and ordered sequentially;
c. A list of the deposition testimony (by witness, page, and line numbers) that that
party intends to offer in his or its case in chief (i.e., not for impeachment), followed
by notation indicating whether any other party has raised an objection to the
testimony, and a space for the Court to record whether and when the testimony is
admitted into evidence;
1
Plaintiff Newby shall mark his exhibits "P-1," P-2," etc. Plaintiff Fogo shall mark his exhibits P100," P-101," etc. The United States shall mark its exhibits "D-1," "D-2," etc.
2
In color, if the original is a color photograph, a multi-colored document, or the like.
d. Copies of the designated deposition testimony, including the first page and the
signature page of the relevant transcript; and
e. Copies of any charts, graphs, or other demonstrative evidence prepared by that
party for use at trial.3
7. Final Pretrial Conference. The parties must appear for a final pretrial conference on
February 24, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. Each party's principal trial counsel must attend, must
be prepared to discuss any remaining pretrial matters, and must be fully informed as to the
availability of that party’s witnesses during the week of March 3, 2025, including any
potential scheduling difficulties.
8. Trial. Trial will commence on March 3, 2025, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom 20A at the
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY
10007. The parties must bring their original pre-marked exhibits with them to trial, and
plaintiffs must be prepared to call their first witness that morning.
Dated: New York, New York
November 22, 2024
SO ORDERED.
________________________________
BARBARA MOSES
United States Magistrate Judge
3
If an exhibit or demonstrative is too bulky to be tabbed into the binder, it may be submitted
separately, clearly marked.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?