Vinci Brands LLC v. Coach Services, Inc. et al

Filing 364

ORDER with respect to 363 Letter Motion to Compel. Case-Mate is directed to submit a response to this letter by no later than Thursday, May 16, 2024. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo on 5/10/2024) (rro)

Download PDF
Paul Del Aguila 71 South Wacker Drive, Suite 1600 Chicago, Illinois 60606-4637 Direct Dial: 312.212.4938 Fax: 312.767.9192 pdelaguila@beneschlaw.com May 9, 2024 5-10-2024 Honorable Valerie Figueredo Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse 500 Pearl Street, Room 1660 New York, NY 10007 FigueredoNYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov Re: Case-Mate is directed to submit a response to this letter by no later than Thursday, May 16, 2024. Vinci Brands LLC v. Coach Services, Inc., et al. – 1:23-cv-05138 Vinci Letter Motion for Order Compelling Case-Mate, Inc. to Produce Unredacted Emails and Communications in Accordance with the Court’s April 29, 2024 Order (ECF 347) Dear Judge Figueredo: On April 29, 2024, Judge Lorna G. Schofield issued its eighth Order compelling CaseMate, Inc. (“Case-Mate”)1 to comply with its discovery obligations, this time ordering CaseMateto “review its entire production thus far and remove all redactions except for those protected by the attorney-client privilege or work-product doctrine” by May 8, 2024. (ECF 347). Thereafter, Case-Mate filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s April 29, 2024 Order, seeking relief regarding the Court’s directive to produce unredacted text messages. Importantly, Case-Mate did not seek any relief regarding the production of unredacted non-text message communications. Although the Court denied Case-Mate’s motion, it granted Case-Mate until May 14, 2024 to produce its unredacted text messages. The Court, however, did not extend the deadline by which Case-Mate was required to remove all redactions, except for those protected by the attorney-client privilege or work-product doctrine, from all non-text message communications. In violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37, Case-Mate failed to comply with the Court’s April 29, 2024 when it failed to produce unredacted non-text message communications by May 8, 2024. Indeed, based on Vinci’s review of Case-Mate’s document production, CaseMate has failed to produce unredacted emails with Vinci (CM47871, CM47876, and CM47913), unredacted google chat messages between employees (CM40619 and CM40595), unredacted internal Case-Mate emails (CM47985), unredacted emails with Vinci’s customers and distributors (CM50436), unredacted emails with third-party Siena (CM 47879 and CM47926), unredacted emails with Vinci’s counsel (CM48699), unredacted emails with Vinci’s investment banker (CM48592 and CM48627), unredacted emails with its secured lender, (CM 48640), unredacted emails with KSNY (CM49920 and CM49469), unredacted emails with ACS’ counsel (CM50870 and CM51194), and over a hundred emails that were redacted. 1 See ECF 247, 252, 273, 279, 287, 300, 312, and 346. www.beneschlaw.com Case 1:23-cv-05138-LGS-VF Document 363 Filed 05/09/24 Page 2 of 2 Judge Valerie Figueredo May 9, 2024 Page 2 Accordingly, Vinci respectfully requests that the Court, once again, enter an Order compelling Case-Mate to produce all unredacted non-text message communications (except for those protected by the attorney-client privilege and/or work product doctrine) by May 12, 2024 and for such other and further relief, including the attorneys’ fees incurred by Vinci in preparing this submission, as the Court deems just and necessary. Very truly yours, BENESCH, FRIEDLANDER, COPLAN & ARONOFF LLP Paul Del Aguila One of the counsel for Vinci Brands LLC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?