Fizzignolia v. City of New York et al

Filing 32

ORDER: Now, after the date for completion of fact discovery expired, plaintiff writes to the Court seeking an extension of time to conduct discovery. He proposes no date and instead request that "the deadlines to complete fact discovery be postponed until there is an opportunity to conduct mediation." (ECF 31.) That request is a non-starter and is denied. The Court notes that the plaintiff's letter is replete with improper disclosure of settlement demands and responsive offers. This Court had set the case for mediation on April 30, 2024, a date cleared with the parties at the March 20, 2024 conference. Nearly a month after the mediation was set, the defendants sought an adjournment of the mediation until an undet ermined date after they had received certain unspecified documentation from plaintiff. At that point a mediator had been selected for the April 30 mediation. Because it takes two willing parties to have a meaningful mediation, the Court vacated the mediation Order, The Court now Orders defendants to file with the Court by October 1, 2024, a report on the discovery conducted to date, its position on a finite extension of the discovery period and its present position regarding mediation. Plai ntiff shall respond by October 3, 2024. The Conference before this Court remains scheduled for October 4, 2024, at 10:30 am. Failure to comply with any aspect of the foregoing will result in a sanction permitted under Rule 37, Fed. R. Civ. P. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 9/24/2024) (vfr)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAMES FIZZIGNOLIA, V. 23-cv-6283 (PKC) Plaintiff, ORDER CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants. CASTEL, United States District Judge. On March 20, 2024, the Court held conference in which it approved the parties' proposed case management plan and set fact discovery to close by August 16, 2024. (ECF 19.) Defendants in this action wrote to the Court more than a month before the expiration of the discovery period seeking an extension of time to complete fact discovery until September 16, 2024. (ECF 25 & 28.) Plaintiffjoined in the request. (ECF 19.) Defendants also asserted that the extension was necessitated by the plaintiffs' failure to timely provide executed releases that were necessary in order to obtain documents. On July 11, 2024, the Comt ordered plaintiff to show cause why it should not be compelled to provide the demanded releases. The Court ultimately granted the extension of fact discovery to September 16, 2024. (ECF 30.) The Court's Order also ruled on the application for releases. (Id. at ,r14.) Now, after the date for completion of fact discove1y expired, plaintiff writes to the Court seeking an extension of time to conduct discovery. He proposes no date and instead request that "the deadlines to complete fact discove1y be postponed until there is an opportunity to conduct mediation." (ECF 31.) That request is a non-starter and is denied. The Court notes that the plaintiffs letter is replete with improper disclosure of settlement demands and responsive offers. This Court had set the case for mediation on April 30, 2024, a date cleared with the parties at the March 20, 2024 conference. Nearly a month after the mediation was set, the defendants sought an adjournment of the mediation until an undetermined date after they had received ce1tain unspecified documentation from plaintiff. At that point a mediator had been selected for the April 30 mediation. Because it takes two willing parties to have a meaningful mediation, the Comt vacated the mediation Order, The Court now Orders defendants to file with the Comt by October 1, 2024, a report on the discove1y conducted to date, its position on a finite extension of the discovery period and its present position regarding mediation. Plaintiff shall respond by October 3, 2024. The Conference before this Comt remains scheduled for October 4, 2024, at I 0:30 am. Failure to comply with any aspect of the foregoing will result in a sanction permitted under Rule 37, Fed. R. Civ. P. SO ORDERED. /�� P. Kevin Castel United States District Judge Dated: New York, New York September 24, 2024

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?