Megginson v. The City of New York et al

Filing 24

ORDER Defendants' request to stay discovery (Doc. 22 at 9) is GRANTED. Defendants' motion presents substantial arguments for dismissal, and a stay would not unfairly prejudice Megginson. See, e.g., HAHA Glob., Inc. v. Barclays, No. 19 Civ. 04749 (VEC) (SDA), 2020 WL 832341, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 20, 2020). Accordingly, discovery in this matter shall be stayed pending resolution of Defendants' motion to dismiss. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to provide a copy of this order to Megginson. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 5/9/2024) (jca)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
MICHAEL E. MEGGINSON,
Plaintiff,
– against –
CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.,

ORDER
23-cv-06798 (ER)

Defendants.
Ramos, D.J.:
Defendants’ request to stay discovery (Doc. 22 at 9) is GRANTED. Defendants’ motion
presents substantial arguments for dismissal, and a stay would not unfairly prejudice Megginson.
See, e.g., HAHA Glob., Inc. v. Barclays, No. 19 Civ. 04749 (VEC) (SDA), 2020 WL 832341, at
*1 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 20, 2020). Accordingly, discovery in this matter shall be stayed pending
resolution of Defendants’ motion to dismiss.
�e Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to provide a copy of this order to Megginson.

SO ORDERED.
Dated:

May 9, 2024
New York, New York
EDGARDO RAMOS, U.S.D.J.