Megginson v. The City of New York et al

Filing 24

ORDER Defendants' request to stay discovery (Doc. 22 at 9) is GRANTED. Defendants' motion presents substantial arguments for dismissal, and a stay would not unfairly prejudice Megginson. See, e.g., HAHA Glob., Inc. v. Barclays, No. 19 Civ. 04749 (VEC) (SDA), 2020 WL 832341, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 20, 2020). Accordingly, discovery in this matter shall be stayed pending resolution of Defendants' motion to dismiss. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to provide a copy of this order to Megginson. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 5/9/2024) (jca)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MICHAEL E. MEGGINSON, Plaintiff, – against – CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., ORDER 23-cv-06798 (ER) Defendants. Ramos, D.J.: Defendants’ request to stay discovery (Doc. 22 at 9) is GRANTED. Defendants’ motion presents substantial arguments for dismissal, and a stay would not unfairly prejudice Megginson. See, e.g., HAHA Glob., Inc. v. Barclays, No. 19 Civ. 04749 (VEC) (SDA), 2020 WL 832341, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 20, 2020). Accordingly, discovery in this matter shall be stayed pending resolution of Defendants’ motion to dismiss. �e Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to provide a copy of this order to Megginson. SO ORDERED. Dated: May 9, 2024 New York, New York EDGARDO RAMOS, U.S.D.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?