Tepale et al v. J.D.B Market Corp. et al
Filing
58
JUDGMENT. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Plaintiff has judgment against Defendants J.D.B Market Corp., Gourmet City Wood Ridge Inc., John Burdo, and Rafael Divino (collectively, the "Defendants") in the amount of Se venteen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and Zero Cents ($17,500.00) (the "Judgment Amount") which is inclusive of attorneys' fees and costs and any other fees, costs, and/or disbursements. This judgment is intended to resolve, in full satisfaction, all of Plaintiff's claims as alleged or which could have been alleged in the Complaint pertaining to this Action, including any damages Plaintiff's asserted or could have asserted in this Action, including but not limited to, any claims Plaintiff may have for monetary damages, backpay, front pay, liquidated damages, penalties, and any fees, costs, and/or reasonable attorneys' fees. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 3/10/25) (yv)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
--------------------------------------------------------------X
Miguel Tepale, on behalf of himself and others
similarly situated in the proposed FLSA
Collective Action,
Plaintiff,
March 10, 2025
Case No.: 1:23-cv-07755
JUDGMENT
- against –
J.D.B Market Corp., Gourmet City Wood Ridge
Inc., John Burdo, and Rafael Divino,
Defendants.
--------------------------------------------------------------X
WHEREAS, on February 5, 2025, Plaintiff Miguel Tepale (the “Plaintiff”) filed a notice
of acceptance of offer of judgment pursuant to Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;
NOW, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Plaintiff has
judgment against Defendants J.D.B Market Corp., Gourmet City Wood Ridge Inc., John Burdo,
and Rafael Divino (collectively, the “Defendants”) in the amount of Seventeen Thousand Five
Hundred Dollars and Zero Cents ($17,500.00) (the “Judgment Amount”) which is inclusive of
attorneys’ fees and costs and any other fees, costs, and/or disbursements.
This judgment is intended to resolve, in full satisfaction, all of Plaintiff’s claims as alleged
or which could have been alleged in the Complaint pertaining to this Action, including any
damages Plaintiff’s asserted or could have asserted in this Action, including but not limited to,
any claims Plaintiff may have for monetary damages, backpay, front pay, liquidated damages,
penalties, and any fees, costs, and/or reasonable attorneys’ fees.
10 2025
Dated: March
________,
SO ORDERED
__________________________________
March 10, 2025
New York, NY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?