Zelvin v. Steven Alan Holdings, LLC

Filing 20

DEFAULT JUDGMENT ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: a. A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12182, et seq., N.Y. Exec. Law § 296, et seq., N.Y.C. Administrative Code § 8-107, et seq., and the laws of New York, is hereby granted as follows: A preliminary and permanent injunction requiring Defendant to take all the steps necessary to make its Website into full compliance with the requirem ents set forth in the ADA, and its implementing regulations, so that the Website is readily accessible to and usable by blind individuals; b. A declaration that Defendant owns, maintains and/or operates its Website in a manner that discriminates ag ainst the blind and which fails to provide access for persons with disabilities as required by Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12182, et seq., N.Y. Exec. Law § 296, et seq., N.Y.C. Administrative Code § 8-107, et se q., and the laws of New York; c. Compensatory damages in the amount of $1,500 including all applicable statutory and punitive damages and fines, to Plaintiff and the proposed class and subclasses for violations of their civil rights under New Y ork State Human Rights Law and City Law; d. Pre and post-judgment interest; e. An award of costs and expenses of this action, in the amount of $1,127, as well as attorneys' fees in the amount of $ 3,600. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 6/3/2024) (jca)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK __________________________________________ LYNN ZELVIN, Plaintiff, Case 1:23-cv-8025 -against- PROPOSED DEFAULT JUDGMENT STEVEN ALAN HOLDINGS, LLC Defendant, __________________________________________ This action having been commenced on September 11, 2023, by the filing of the Summons and Complaint, and a copy of the Summons and Complaint having been personally served on Defendant, on October 13, 2023, and a proof of service having been filed on November 14, 2023, and the defendant not having answered the Complaint, and the time for answering the Complaint having expired, it is: ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: a. A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12182, et seq., N.Y. Exec. Law § 296, et seq., N.Y.C. Administrative Code § 8-107, et seq., and the laws of New York, is hereby granted as follows: A preliminary and permanent injunction requiring Defendant to take all the steps necessary to make its Website into full compliance with the requirements set forth in the ADA, and its implementing regulations, so that the Website is readily accessible to and usable by blind individuals; b. A declaration that Defendant owns, maintains and/or operates its Website in a manner that discriminates against the blind and which fails to provide access for persons with disabilities as required by Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12182, et seq., N.Y. Exec. Law § 296, et seq., N.Y.C. Administrative Code § 8-107, et seq., and the laws of New York; c. Compensatory damages in the amount of $1,500 including all applicable statutory and punitive damages and fines, to Plaintiff and the proposed class and subclasses for violations of their civil rights under New York State Human Rights Law and City Law; d. Pre and post-judgment interest; e. An award of costs and expenses of this action, in the amount of $1,127, as well as attorneys’ fees in the amount of $ 3,600; f. A hearing to be held in the courthouse to determine the specific amount of damages, civil penalties, and reasonable attorney fees; and g. Such other and further relief as this Court may deem just, proper and equitable. June 3, 2024 Dated: New York, New York _______________________________ Hon. Edgardo Ramos United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?