2/25/94 LLC et al v. Eastern Airlines, LLC
Filing
43
ORDER granting 42 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; terminating 14 Motion to Dismiss. Application GRANTED nunc pro tunc. By separate order, the Court will enter the parties' proposed amended case management plan. All pending motions are terminated without prejudice to refiling in the event that the parties' settlement in principle is not consummated. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF Nos. 14 and 42. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Jennifer H. Rearden on 1/27/2025) (jca)
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Amanda J. Brookhyser
Amanda J. Brookhyser, Esq.
PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND,
WHARTON & GARRISON LLP
ZUMPANO PATRICIOS,
P.A.
By: /s/ Jay Cohen
Jay Cohen
Brette Tannenbaum
Daniel A. Negless
1285 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10019-6064
Tel: (212) 373-3000
jaycohen@paulweiss.com
btannenbaum@paulweiss.com
dnegless@paulweiss.com
By: /s/ Mark Fang
Mark Fang
134 East 38 th Street
New York, New York 10016
Tel: (212)542-2564
mfang@zplaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs 2/25/94 LLC
and New England Patriots LLC
and,
Amanda J. Brookhyser
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
ZUMPANO PATRICIOS
& HELSTEN, PLLC
1210 South Valley View Boulevard,
Suite 215
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
abrookhyser@zplaw.com
Attorneys for Defendant Eastern
Airlines, LLC
EXHIBIT A
(Proposed Amended Scheduling Order)
5.
Counsel for the parties believe the following alternative dispute resolution mechanisms
may be helpful in resolving this case (check all that apply):
Immediate referral to a Magistrate Judge
Referral to a Magistrate Judge after the close of fact discovery
Retention of a private mediator
Other
6.
Except for amendments permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1), amended pleadings may
not be filed, and additional parties may not be joined, except with leave of the Court.
Any motion to amend or to join additional parties shall be filed within
days of the
date of this Order. [Absent exceptional circumstances, a date not more than 30 days
following the initial pretrial conference.]
7.
Initial disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) shall be completed no later than
days of the date of this Order. [Absent exceptional circumstances, a date not more
than 14 days following the initial pretrial conference.]
8.
[If applicable] The plaintiff(s) shall provide HIPAA-compliant medical records release
authorizations to the defendant(s) no later than _N_o_t_Ap_p_li_c_a_b_le
.
9.
Discovery
a. The parties are to conduct discovery in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure and the Local Rules of the Southern District of New York.
b. All fact discovery shall be completed no later than
. [A date
not more than 120 days following the initial pretrial conference (or 90 days for IDEA
fee-shifting cases), unless the Court finds that the case presents unique complexities
or other exceptional circumstances.]
c. The parties agree that there [is
/ is no
] need for expert discovery. If the parties
agree that there is no need for expert discovery, all discovery shall be completed by
the deadline for fact discovery, unless prior to that date a party files, and the Court
grants, a letter-motion seeking an extension for purposes of taking expert discovery;
any such letter-motion should explain why expert discovery has become necessary
and propose a schedule for it. [If any party believes that there is a need for expert
discovery, the parties should complete Paragraph 9(d).]
2
i. Absent an order of the Court, depositions shall not be held until all parties
have responded to initial requests for document production.
ii. There shall be no priority in deposition by reason of a
plaintiff or a defendant.
status as a
iii. Absent an order of the Court, non-party depositions shall follow initial
party depositions.
e. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, requests to admit shall be served by no
later than 30 days before the close of discovery.
f. Any of the deadlines in Paragraphs 10(a) through 10(e) may be extended by the
written consent of all parties without application to the Court, provided that all
fact discovery is completed by the date set forth in Paragraph 9(b).
g. In the event that the case will involve expert discovery, the parties shall meet and
confer, no later than 30 days prior to the date in Paragraph 9(b) (i.e., the
completion of all fact discovery), on a schedule for expert disclosures, including
deadlines to serve reports (including rebuttal reports, if applicable), to produce
documents, and to complete depositions, provided that (1) expert report(s) of the
expert(s); and (2) all expert discovery shall be completed by the date set forth in
Paragraph 9(d).
11.
All motions and applications shall be governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
Rules
and Practices (available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jennifer-h-rearden).
12.
In the case of discovery disputes, the parties should follow Local Civil Rule 37.2 with
the following modifications. Any party wishing to raise a discovery dispute with the
Court must first meet and confer in good faith with the opposing party in person,
virtually, or by telephone in an effort to resolve the dispute. Conferring in writing
does not satisfy this requirement. If this process fails, the party shall, in accordance
-motion, no longer than six
double-spaced pages, explaining the nature of the dispute and requesting an informal
conference. Such a letter-motion must include a representation that the parties engaged
in a good faith meet-and-confer process that proved unsuccessful. Any opposition to a
letter-motion seeking relief shall be filed as a letter, not to exceed six double-spaced
pages, within three business days. Counsel should be prepared to discuss with the
Court the matters raised by such letters, as the Court will seek to resolve discovery
disputes quickly, by order, by conference, or by telephone. Counsel should seek
relief in accordance with these procedures in a timely fashion.
13.
All counsel must meet in person for at least one hour to discuss settlement within 14 days
following the close of fact discovery.
4
14.
Absent good cause, the Court will not have summary judgment practice in a non-jury
case. Summary judgment motions, if applicable, and any motion to exclude the
testimony of experts pursuant to Rules 702-705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence and
the Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), line of cases, shall be
filed within 30 days of the close of fact or expert discovery (whichever is later).
Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, opposition to any such motion shall be filed
two weeks after the motion is served on the opposing party, and a reply, if any, is to
be filed one week after service of any opposition.
15.
Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, within 30 days of the close of all discovery, or,
if a dispositive motion has been filed, within 30 days of a decision on such motion, the
parties shall submit to the Court for its approval a Joint Pretrial Order prepared in
parties
Cases, which identifies submissions that must be made concurrently with the Joint
Pretrial Order, including any motions in limine and, if the action is to be tried before a
jury, proposed voir dire questions, or, if the action is to be tried to the Court, proposed
findings of fact and conclusions of law.
16.
Unless the Court orders otherwise for good cause shown, the parties shall be ready for
trial two weeks after the Joint Pretrial Order is filed.
17.
This case [is
18.
Counsel for the parties have conferred and the present best estimate of the length of
trial is _3_-5 d_a_y_s
.
19.
Other issues to be addressed at the Initial Pretrial Conference, including those set forth
in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(3), are set forth below.
/ is not
] to be tried to a jury.
_N_o_t_a_p_p_l_ic_a_b_l_e
TO BE FILLED IN BY THE COURT IF APPLICABLE:
shall file a motion for/to
later than _
. Any opposition shall be filed by
Any reply shall be filed by
.
5
no
.
The parties shall contact the Chambers of the Magistrate Judge assigned to this case on or
before
in order to schedule the settlement discussion under his/her supervision in
or about
.
The parties shall file a joint letter by
, indicating whether they
would like the Court to refer the case to the assigned Magistrate Judge and/or the Court
mediation program for settlement purposes and, if so, approximately when they believe a
settlement conference should be held.
The next pretrial conference is scheduled for
Unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the conference will be held
at
.
.
Absent leave of Court, by one week prior to any future conference, the parties shall file on
ECF a joint letter, not to exceed three pages, regarding the status of the case. The letter should
include the following information in separate paragraphs:
(1)
A statement indicating whether the parties believe that the pretrial conference is
unnecessary. If so, the Court may still hold the pretrial conference, although perhaps at a
different time. To that end, counsel should indicate in their joint letter dates and times
during the week of the conference that they would be available;
(2)
A statement of all existing deadlines, due dates, and/or cut-off dates;
(3)
A brief description of any outstanding motions;
(4)
A brief description of the status of discovery and of any additional discovery that needs to
be completed;
(5)
A list of all prior settlement discussions, including the date, the parties involved, whether
any third-party (e.g., Magistrate Judge, mediator, etc.) was involved, and the approximate
duration of any such discussions;
(6)
A statement of whether or how the Court could facilitate settlement of the case (for
example, through a(nother) settlement conference before the assigned Magistrate Judge,
Program);
(7)
A statement of the anticipated length of trial, and whether the case is to be tried to a jury;
(8)
A statement of whether the parties anticipate filing motions for summary judgment;
(9)
Any other issue that the parties would like to address at the pretrial conference; and
(10)
Any information that the parties believe may assist the Court in advancing the case to
settlement or trial.
6
SO ORDERED.
Dated:
New York, New York
JENNIFER H. REARDEN
United States District Judge
7
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?