Moshir v. Chef/Cook et al

Filing 3

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: By order dated September 28, 2023, the Court directed Plaintiff, within 30 days, to submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP application) or pay the $402.00 in fees required to file a civil action in t his court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an IFP application or paid the fees. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 19 14, 1915. The Court has previously warned Plaintiff that further vexatious or frivolous litigation in this Court may result in an order barring Plaintiff from filing new actions IFP unless he receives prior permission. See Moshir v. IGPP USA, In c., ECF 23-CV-8459, 3 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 31, 2023) (relying on 28 U.S.C. § 1651). The Court repeats that warning. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and theref ore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). Judgment shall enter. (Signed by Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 11/14/2023) (tg)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ALI MOSHIR, Plaintiff, -against- 23-CV-8786 (LTS) ORDER OF DISMISSAL CHEF/COOK, ET AL., Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated September 28, 2023, the Court directed Plaintiff, within 30 days, to submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP application) or pay the $402.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an IFP application or paid the fees. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. The Court has previously warned Plaintiff that further vexatious or frivolous litigation in this Court may result in an order barring Plaintiff from filing new actions IFP unless he receives prior permission. See Moshir v. IGPP USA, Inc., ECF 23-CV-8459, 3 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 31, 2023) (relying on 28 U.S.C. § 1651). The Court repeats that warning. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). Judgment shall enter. Dated: November 14, 2023 New York, New York /s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?