Mullings v. Finley
Filing
4
ORDER: The Court, however, acknowledges that earlier precedent is not pellucid on this point. In particular, in Carbo v. United States, 364 U.S. 611 (1961), the Court held that the writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum ("prosecutorial writ") may issue extraterritorially, but left open the question as to the writ at issue here-the writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum ("testimonial writ"). For the avoidance of doubt, however, the Court sua sponte proposes to transfer this case to the Middle District of Pennsylvania, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a), as courts routinely do when presented with Section 2241 petitions filed in an improper venue. See Shehnaz v. Ashcroft, No. 04 Civ. 2578 (DLC), 2004 WL 2378371, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 25, 2004) (collecting cases). Given the rapidly approaching deadline for Mullings's scheduled deposition, the Court orders Mullings to file, by November 7, 2023, a letter on the docket of this case responding to the Court's proposal to transfer his petition. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 11/3/2023) (ks) (Main Document 4 replaced on 11/6/2023) (rro).
UNITED STATES DISTRlCT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRlCT OF NEW YORK
KYLE T. MULLINGS,
-v-
Petitioner,
SCOTT FINLEY, WARDEN, FCI SCHUYLKILL,
23 Civ. 9603 (PAE)
ORDER
Respondent.
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge:
On November 1, 2023, petitioner Kyle T. Mullings filed the present petition for a writ of
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Dkt. 1. Mullings is the plaintiff in a pending civil
action in New York state court, in which he seeks damages for personal injuries arising out of an
automobile accident on July 19, 2016. Dkt. 1, Ex. 1 at 2-5 (underlying complaint). He is also an
inmate at Federal Correctional Institution, Schuylkill ("FCI Schuylkill"), located in Minersville,
Pennsylvania, where he is serving a 12-year term of imprisonment for various offenses.
Judgment, Dkt. 108, United States v. Mullings, 19 Crim. 779 (AKH) (entered Jan. 4, 2023);
Judgment, Dkt. 388, United States v. Mullings, 15 Cr. 854 (SHS) (entered July 26, 2019).
Mullins requests that the Court issue the writ to require respondent Scott Finley, Warden ofFCI
Schuylkill, to produce him for a deposition on December 13, 2023, at 10:00 a.m., presumably to
be taken within FCI Schuylkill. Dkt. 1 at 2.
As Mullins notes, Section 2241 permits federal courts to issue a writ of habeas corpus if
"[i]t is necessary to bring [a prisoner] into court to testify or for trial." 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(5).
It appears, however, that he has sought the writ from the wrong federal court. District courts are
limited to granting habeas relief"within their respective jurisdictions." 28 U.S.C. § 2241(a). As
the Supreme Court explained in Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426 (2004), the "traditional rule"
for such petitions is that jurisdiction over a prisoner's custodian "lies in only one district: the
district of confinement." Id. at 443; see also, e.g., Carbo v. United States, 364 U.S. 611,617
(1961). For FCI Schuylkill, that district is the Middle District of Pennsylvania, not the Southern
District of New York.
The Court, however, acknowledges that earlier precedent is not pellucid on this point. In
particular, in Carbo v. United States, 364 U.S. 611 (1961), the Court held that the writ of habeas
corpus ad prosequendum ("prosecutorial writ") may issue extraterritorially, but left open the
question as to the writ at issue here-the writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum ("testimonial
writ"). For the avoidance of doubt, however, the Court sua sponte proposes to transfer this case
to the Middle District of Pennsylvania, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), as courts routinely do
when presented with Section 2241 petitions filed in an improper venue. See Shehnaz v. Ashcroft,
No. 04 Civ. 2578 (DLC), 2004 WL 2378371, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 25, 2004) (collecting cases).
Given the rapidly approaching deadline for Mullings's scheduled deposition, the Court orders
Mullings to file, by November 7, 2023, a letter on the docket of this case responding to the
Court's proposal to transfer his petition.
SO ORDERED.
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER
United States District Judge
Dated: November 3, 2023
New York, New York
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?