Jones, Esq. v. Landry's, Inc. et al
Filing
71
ORDER, On March 11, 2025, Plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss JOMR with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). Dkt. No. 70. Any opposition to Plaintiff's motion to dismiss JOMR with prejudice should be filed no later than March 25, 2025. Any reply should be filed no later than April 1, 2025. SO ORDERED. ( Replies due by 4/1/2025., Responses due by 3/25/2025) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 3/11/25) (yv)
Case 1:23-cv-09920-GHW-JW
Document 71
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
----------------------------------------------------------------- X
:
JOY VIDA JONES, ESQ.,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
-v:
:
LANDRY’S, INC., et al.,
:
:
Defendants. :
:
------------------------------------------------------------------ X
GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge:
Filed 03/11/25
Page 1 of 1
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #: _________________
DATE FILED: 3/11/2025
1:23-cv-9920-GHW
ORDER
On February 13, 2025, the Court noted that this case is subject to an automatic stay pursuant
to 11 U.S.C. § 362(a). Dkt. No. 67. On March 10, 2025, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Florida entered an order lifting the automatic stay “solely to the extent necessary to
permit [Plaintiff] to prosecute [a] Dismissal Motion and take any reasonable actions to dismiss with
prejudice [Defendant Just One More Restaurant Corp. (“JOMR”)] as a defendant” in this action.
Dkt. No. 70-2 at 2. On March 11, 2025, Plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss JOMR with prejudice,
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). Dkt. No. 70. Any opposition to Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss
JOMR with prejudice should be filed no later than March 25, 2025. Any reply should be filed no
later than April 1, 2025.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 11, 2025
New York, New York
__________________________________
GREGORY H. WOODS
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?