Suarez v. Blue Sky Cycling, Inc.
Filing
12
ORDER, Defendant Blue Sky Cycling, Inc. is hereby deemed in default. As stated in the Court's prior order at ECF No. 10, Plaintiff Suarez is directed to (1) file a status letter or (2) move for default judgment against Defendant on or before March 1, 2024. Plaintiff is also directed to serve a copy of this order by mail on Defendant within seven days. SO ORDERED. ( Motions due by 3/1/2024.) (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 2/6/24) (yv)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
ALVIN SUAREZ, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
-v-
23-CV-10126 (JPO)
ORDER
BLUE SKY CYCLING, INC.,
Defendant.
J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge:
On January 19, 2024, business-entity Defendant Blue Sky Cycling, Inc. (“Blue Sky”) was
warned that it had 14 days, or until February 2, 2024, to have counsel appear on its behalf and
respond to the complaint. (ECF No. 10.) The Court warned Blue Sky that if it failed to do so, it
would risk the entry of a default judgment against it, as companies must be represented by
counsel and cannot appear pro se. (Id.) The allotted time for Blue Sky to have counsel appear
on its behalf has passed.
Accordingly, Defendant Blue Sky Cycling, Inc. is hereby deemed in default.
As stated in the Court’s prior order at ECF No. 10, Plaintiff Suarez is directed to (1) file a
status letter or (2) move for default judgment against Defendant on or before March 1, 2024.
Plaintiff is also directed to serve a copy of this order by mail on Defendant within seven
days.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 6, 2024
New York, New York
____________________________________
J. PAUL OETKEN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?