Suarez v. Blue Sky Cycling, Inc.

Filing 12

ORDER, Defendant Blue Sky Cycling, Inc. is hereby deemed in default. As stated in the Court's prior order at ECF No. 10, Plaintiff Suarez is directed to (1) file a status letter or (2) move for default judgment against Defendant on or before March 1, 2024. Plaintiff is also directed to serve a copy of this order by mail on Defendant within seven days. SO ORDERED. ( Motions due by 3/1/2024.) (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 2/6/24) (yv)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ALVIN SUAREZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, -v- 23-CV-10126 (JPO) ORDER BLUE SKY CYCLING, INC., Defendant. J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: On January 19, 2024, business-entity Defendant Blue Sky Cycling, Inc. (“Blue Sky”) was warned that it had 14 days, or until February 2, 2024, to have counsel appear on its behalf and respond to the complaint. (ECF No. 10.) The Court warned Blue Sky that if it failed to do so, it would risk the entry of a default judgment against it, as companies must be represented by counsel and cannot appear pro se. (Id.) The allotted time for Blue Sky to have counsel appear on its behalf has passed. Accordingly, Defendant Blue Sky Cycling, Inc. is hereby deemed in default. As stated in the Court’s prior order at ECF No. 10, Plaintiff Suarez is directed to (1) file a status letter or (2) move for default judgment against Defendant on or before March 1, 2024. Plaintiff is also directed to serve a copy of this order by mail on Defendant within seven days. SO ORDERED. Dated: February 6, 2024 New York, New York ____________________________________ J. PAUL OETKEN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?