Turner et al v. Fierce NYC et al

Filing 80

ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall submit a supplemental memorandum no later than November 26, 2024, explaining why prejudgment interest is appropriate in this case, what the proper prejudgment interest rate is, the date on which th e cause of action accrued, and the appropriate calculation of interest through November 26, 2024. In considering these issues, Plaintiffs should also address how the prejudgment interest calculation is impacted by Plaintiff's request for both compensatory and punitive damages and the fact that this case involves a mixed federal and state judgment. See, e.g., Cioffi v. New York Community Bank, 465 F. Supp. 2d 202, 222 (E.D.N.Y. 2006) (addressing prejudgment interest in a case involving claims for sexual harassment under Title VII and the New York Human Rights Law). In the absence of a supplemental filing by the deadline, the Court will enter the proposed judgment without prejudgment interest and without further notice. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 11/22/24) (yv)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X : CHRISTENNA TURNER et al., : : Plaintiffs, : : -v: : FIERCE NYC et al., : : Defendants. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X 23-CV-10276 (JMF) ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: On November 21, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a proposed default judgment order seeking $450,000 in compensatory and punitive damages in addition to prejudgment interest calculated at a 9% interest rate. See ECF No. 79. Plaintiffs’ prior filings, however, neither addressed nor requested prejudgment interest. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall submit a supplemental memorandum no later than November 26, 2024, explaining why prejudgment interest is appropriate in this case, what the proper prejudgment interest rate is, the date on which the cause of action accrued, and the appropriate calculation of interest through November 26, 2024. In considering these issues, Plaintiffs should also address how the prejudgment interest calculation is impacted by Plaintiffs’ request for both compensatory and punitive damages and the fact that this case involves a mixed federal and state judgment. See, e.g., Cioffi v. New York Community Bank, 465 F. Supp. 2d 202, 222 (E.D.N.Y. 2006) (addressing prejudgment interest in a case involving claims for sexual harassment under Title VII and the New York Human Rights Law). In the absence of a supplemental filing by the deadline, the Court will enter the proposed judgment without prejudgment interest and without further notice. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 22, 2024 New York, New York __________________________________ JESSE M. FURMAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?