Norman Maurice Rowe, M.D. MHA LLC et al v. Oxford Health Insurance, Inc.

Filing 16

ORDER granting 15 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. Letter-motion GRANTED. Defendant's response is due on May 2, 2024. The parties are reminded that the initial pretrial conference will take place on May 1, 2024, and the case management plan and joint letter are due by April 24, 2024. See Dkt. No. 13. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Dkt. No. 15. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Margaret M. Garnett on 3/27/2024) (mml)

Download PDF
Case 1:23-cv-10344-MMG Document 15 Filed 03/26/24 Page 1 of 1 MATTHEW P. MAZZOLA Chrysler East Building 666 Third Avenue, 20th floor New York, NY 10017-4132 Main (212) 451-2900 Fax (212) 451-2999 mmazzola@rc.com Direct (212) 451-2914 3/27/2024 March 26, 2024 Also admitted in Florida and New Jersey Letter-motion GRANTED. Defendant's response is due on May 2, 2024. The parties are reminded that the initial pretrial conference will take place on May 1, 2024, and the case management plan and joint letter are due by April 24, 2024. See Dkt. No. 13. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Dkt. No. 15. (Via ECF) Hon. Margaret M. Garnett United States District Judge SO ORDERED. Date 3/27/2024 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York HON. MARGARET M. GARNETT 100 Federal Plaza U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Central Islip, NY 11201 Re: Norman Maurice Rowe, M.D., M.H.A., L.L.C., et. al. v. Oxford Health Insurance, Inc. Case No.: 1:23-cv-10344(MMG) Dear Judge Garnett: This office represents the Defendant Oxford Health Insurance, Inc. (“Oxford”) in the above-referenced matter. We write pursuant to Rule I(B)(5) of Your Honor’s Individual Rules & Practices to request a 30-day extension of the deadline for Oxford to respond to the Complaint from April 2, 2024 to and including May 2, 2024. Oxford was only served with the Summons and Complaint in this matter on March 14, 2024 and considering that the Complaint concerns medical claims on behalf of 21 different members of plans administered by Oxford, Oxford requires more time to locate the applicable claim documentation in order to provide a meaningful response to the Complaint. This is Oxford’s first request for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint and Plaintiff consents to the relief requested herein. I appreciate your attention to this matter. Respectfully submitted, Matthew P. Mazzola cc: All Counsel of Record (via ECF)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?