Norman Maurice Rowe, M.D. MHA LLC et al v. Oxford Health Insurance, Inc.

Filing 16

ORDER granting 15 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. Letter-motion GRANTED. Defendant's response is due on May 2, 2024. The parties are reminded that the initial pretrial conference will take place on May 1, 2024, and the case management plan and joint letter are due by April 24, 2024. See Dkt. No. 13. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Dkt. No. 15. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Margaret M. Garnett on 3/27/2024) (mml)

Case 1:23-cv-10344-MMG Document 15 Filed 03/26/24 Page 1 of 1
MATTHEW P. MAZZOLA
Chrysler East Building
666 Third Avenue, 20th floor
New York, NY 10017-4132
Main [phone]
Fax [phone]
[e-mail]
Direct [phone]
3/27/2024

March 26, 2024

Also admitted in Florida
and New Jersey
Letter-motion GRANTED. Defendant's response is due on May 2, 2024. The
parties are reminded that the initial pretrial conference will take place on May
1, 2024, and the case management plan and joint letter are due by April 24,
2024. See Dkt. No. 13. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Dkt. No.
15.

(Via ECF)
Hon. Margaret M. Garnett
United States District Judge
SO ORDERED. Date 3/27/2024
U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of New York HON. MARGARET M. GARNETT
100 Federal Plaza
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Central Islip, NY 11201
Re:

Norman Maurice Rowe, M.D., M.H.A., L.L.C., et. al. v. Oxford Health Insurance, Inc.
Case No.: 1:23-cv-10344(MMG)

Dear Judge Garnett:
This office represents the Defendant Oxford Health Insurance, Inc. (“Oxford”) in the
above-referenced matter. We write pursuant to Rule I(B)(5) of Your Honor’s Individual Rules &
Practices to request a 30-day extension of the deadline for Oxford to respond to the Complaint
from April 2, 2024 to and including May 2, 2024. Oxford was only served with the Summons and
Complaint in this matter on March 14, 2024 and considering that the Complaint concerns medical
claims on behalf of 21 different members of plans administered by Oxford, Oxford requires more
time to locate the applicable claim documentation in order to provide a meaningful response to
the Complaint. This is Oxford’s first request for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint
and Plaintiff consents to the relief requested herein.
I appreciate your attention to this matter.
Respectfully submitted,

Matthew P. Mazzola
cc: All Counsel of Record (via ECF)