Carter v. Park, et al

Filing 17

ORDER. The Court's March 21, 2024 endorsement granting Plaintiff's Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing is VACATED (although the Clerk of Court should leave it on the docket), see ECF No. 16, and the Clerk of Court is directed not to provide Plaintiff with ECF privileges (or, if they have already been granted, to rescind them). Plaintiff is reminded that he may not contact Chambers directly, including but not limited telephone, email, or regular mail. Instead, all commu nications with the Court must be made through the Pro Se Office in accordance with the Court's Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Pro Se Cases. Failure to comply with this Order and those restrictions, and future filings of an inappropri ate or inflammatory nature, may result in sanctions, including dismissal of this case. This Court certifies, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 1915(a) (3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and in form a pauperis status is thus denied. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and, as noted above, directed not to provide Plaintiff with ECF privileges (or, if they have already been granted, to rescind them). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 3/26/24) (yv)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------------- X
:
DARRYL C. CARTER,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
-v:
:
MOLLY WASOW PARK, et al.,
:
:
Defendants.
:
:
---------------------------------------------------------------------- X

23-CV-10887 (JMF)
ORDER

JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge:
On March 21, 2024, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for permission for electronic
case filing. See ECF No. 16. On March 25, 2024, Plaintiff emailed and called the Court,
violating the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Pro Se Cases (available at http://
nysd.uscourts.gov/judge/Furman), which prohibit pro se Plaintiffs from directly contacting
Chambers. Plaintiff’s email (a copy of which is attached) includes an attachment of emails with
the ECF Help Desk, in which Plaintiff repeatedly uses inappropriate and inflammatory language.
He also references another case in which he had access to electronic case filing, Carter v. Sewell,
23-CV-1139 (JLR). Upon review of that docket, and in light of Plaintiff’s submissions of March
25, 2024, the Court concludes that Plaintiff should not be permitted access to electronic filing in
this case. Accordingly, the Court’s March 21, 2024 endorsement granting Plaintiff’s Motion for
Permission for Electronic Case Filing is VACATED (although the Clerk of Court should leave it
on the docket), see ECF No. 16, and the Clerk of Court is directed not to provide Plaintiff
with ECF privileges (or, if they have already been granted, to rescind them).
Plaintiff is reminded that he may not contact Chambers directly, including but not limited

to telephone, email, or regular mail. Instead, all communications with the Court must be made
through the Pro Se Office in accordance with the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices in Civil
Pro Se Cases. Failure to comply with this Order and those restrictions, and future filings of an
inappropriate or inflammatory nature, may result in sanctions, including dismissal of this case.
This Court certifies, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 1915(a)(3), that
any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and in forma pauperis status is thus
denied. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).
The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and, as noted
above, directed not to provide Plaintiff with ECF privileges (or, if they have already been
granted, to rescind them).
SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 26, 2024
New York, New York

__________________________________
JESSE M. FURMAN
United States District Judge

2

From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:

Darryl C Carter
Furman NYSD Chambers
Darryl C Carter
Darryl C. Carter v. Molly W. Park: 23-cv-10887-JMF, Issue with the Court"s Order
Monday, March 25, 2024 8:55:43 PM
Darryl C. Carter v. Molly W. Park_ 23-cv-10887-JMF.pdf
23cv10887_helpdesk_order_032514.pdf

CAUTION - EXTERNAL:

Hon. Jesse M. Furman Chambers:
Please be advised that I hope to only say this once and to make
my point resoundingly clear. It is imperative that you take off any
rose colored glasses which you may have and realize that these
negroes and this WOKE/SWAMP mob are engaging in all manners
of fraud and criminal misconduct including the illegal monitoring of
my internet connection and illegally wiretapping of my voice
communications. They are hell bent on some type of doctored up
fraudulent judgment and my case(s) have been targeted because
they are Pro Se and pro se cases are treated in an inferior manner
by this district, generally, which lends opportunity for them to
engage in fraud. This is not a one or two person scheme, it is very
well organized. To that end, it might be necessary for the court to
be far more vigilant in this case and any matter with my name on
it that comes through this court.
As to the specific request, it simply involves fulfillment of the
CM/ECF request which is so complicated for the ECF  Helpdesk to
fulfill (which is their pretext for the back channel fraud activity).
Rather than file unnecessary papers, I would like to see how the
court would like to proceed on this matter, it may be as simple as
your deputy clerk making a five minute phone call to the ECF
helpdesk to clear up the matter, so we can move on.
Sorry for this stupid correspondence, but that is where we are at
today, the cesspool land of NYC and their never ending fraud
schemes wasting your time and mine, at least your time is paid,
my time is not.
See two (2) pdfs attached for the complete context.
Regards,

Darryl

CAUTION - EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated outside the Judiciary. Exercise caution
when opening attachments or clicking on links.