U.S. Bank National Association v. Mattone et al

Filing 72

CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 70 Report and Recommendations 71 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations in favor of Carl F Mattone, Michael x Mattone against U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee on Behalf of the Registered Holders of GS Mo rtgage Securities Corporation II, Commercial Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2012-GCJ9,. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated March 10, 2025, as of the date of the Order, no objections have been filed, and no request for an extension of time to object has been made. Accordingly, Plaintiff has waived the right to object to the Report and Recommendation or to get appellate review. See Frank v. Johnson, 968 F.2d 298, 300 (2d Cir. 1992); see also Caidor v. Onondaga County, 517 F.3d 601 (2d Cir. 2008). Despite the waiver, the Court has reviewed the complaint, briefs, and Report and Recommendation, unguided by objections, and finds the Report and Recommendation to be well-reasoned and grounded in fact and law. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety. (Signed by Clerk of Court Tammi M Hellwig on 3/10/2025) (Attachments: # 1 Appeal Package) (km)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------------X
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS
TRUSTEE ON BEHALF OF THE REGISTERED
HOLDERS OF GS MORTGAGE SECURITIES
CORPORATION II, COMMERCIAL
MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH
CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2012-GCJ9,

23 CIVIL 11035 (ALC)(BCM)

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT

-againstMICHAEL X. MATTONE AND CARL F.
MATTONE.,
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------X

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the
Court's Order dated March 10, 2025, as of the date of the Order, no objections have been filed, and no request
for an extension of time to object has been made. Accordingly, Plaintiff has waived the right to object to the
Report and Recommendation or to get appellate review. See Frank v. Johnson, 968 F.2d 298, 300 (2d Cir.
1992); see also Caidor v. Onondaga County, 517 F.3d 601 (2d Cir. 2008). Despite the waiver, the Court has
reviewed the complaint, briefs, and Report and Recommendation, unguided by objections, and finds the Report
and Recommendation to be well-reasoned and grounded in fact and law. Accordingly, the Report and
Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety.
Dated: New York, New York
March 10, 2025
TAMMI M. HELLWIG
_________________________
Clerk of Court
BY:

_________________________
Deputy Clerk