McGlynn v. Xcel Brands, Inc.

Filing 49

PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material...SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Rochon on 11/26/2024) (jca)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------x
DAVID MCGLYNN,

No. 1:23-cv-11123 (JLR)
Plaintiff,

The Honorable Jennifer L. Rochon
United States District Judge

v.
XCEL BRANDS, INC., and GROUP JS
INTERNATIONAL LTD. D/B/A JS GROUP
INTERNATIONAL,

PROTECTIVE ORDER

Defendants.
------------------------------------------------------------x
WHEREAS all of the parties to this action (collectively, the “Parties,” and individually, a
“Party”) request that this Court issue a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 26(c) to protect the confidentiality of certain nonpublic and confidential material that
will be exchanged pursuant to and during the course of discovery in this case;
WHEREAS, the Parties, through counsel, agree to the following terms;
WHEREAS, the Parties acknowledge that this Protective Order does not confer blanket
protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords only
extends to the limited information or items that are entitled, under the applicable legal principles,
to confidential treatment;
WHEREAS, the Parties further acknowledge that this Protective Order does not create
entitlement to file confidential information under seal; and
WHEREAS, in light of these acknowledgements, and based on the representations of the
Parties that discovery in this case will involve confidential documents or information the public
disclosure of which will cause harm to the producing person and/or third party to whom a duty of
confidentiality is owed, and to protect against injury caused by dissemination of confidential
documents and information, this Court finds good cause for issuance of an appropriately tailored
confidentiality order governing the pretrial phase of this action;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any person subject to this Protective Order – including
without limitation the Parties to this action, their representatives, agents, experts and consultants,
all third parties providing discovery in this action, and all other interested persons with actual or
constructive notice of this Protective Order – shall adhere to the following terms:

1

Any person subject to this Protective Order who receives from any other person subject to this
Protective Order any “Discovery Material” (i.e., information of any kind produced or disclosed
pursuant to and in course of discovery in this action) that is designated as
1.
“Confidential” pursuant to the terms of this Protective Order (hereinafter
“Confidential Discovery Material”) shall not disclose such Confidential Discovery Material to
anyone else except as expressly permitted hereunder.
2.
The person producing any given Discovery Material may designate as
Confidential only such portion of such material the public disclosure of which is either restricted
by law or will cause harm to the business, commercial, financial or personal interests of the
producing person and/or a third party to whom a duty of confidentiality is owed and that consists
of:
(a) previously nondisclosed financial information (including without limitation
profitability reports or estimates, percentage fees, design fees, royalty rates, minimum guarantee
payments, sales reports, and sale margins);
(b) previously nondisclosed material relating to ownership or control of any nonpublic company;
(c) previously nondisclosed business plans, product development information, or
marketing plans;
(d) any information of a personal or intimate nature regarding any individual; or
(e) any other category of information hereinafter given confidential status by the
Court.
3.
With respect to the Confidential portion of any Discovery Material other than
deposition transcripts and exhibits, the producing person or that person’s counsel may designate
such portion as “Confidential” by stamping or otherwise clearly marking as “Confidential” the
protected portion in a manner that will not interfere with legibility or audibility.
4.
With respect to deposition transcripts, a producing person or that person’s counsel
may designate such portion as Confidential either by (a) indicating on the record during the
deposition that a question calls for Confidential information, in which case the reporter will bind
the transcript of the designated testimony (consisting of question and answer) in a separate
volume and mark it as “Confidential Information Governed by Protective Order”; or (b)
notifying the reporter and all counsel of record, in writing, within 30 days after a deposition has
concluded, of the specific pages and lines of the transcript and/or the specific exhibits that are to
be designated Confidential, in which case all counsel receiving the transcript will be responsible
for marking the copies of the designated transcript or exhibit (as the case may be), in their
possession or under their control as directed by the producing person or that person’s counsel by
the reporter. During the 30-day period following the conclusion of a deposition, the entire
deposition transcript will be treated as if it had been designated Confidential.

2

If at any time prior to the trial of this action, a producing person realizes that some
5.
portion(s) of Discovery Material that she, he, or it had previously produced without limitation
should be designated as Confidential, she, he, or it may so designate by so apprising all prior
recipients of the Discovery Material in writing, and thereafter such designated portion(s) of the
Discovery Material will thereafter be deemed to be and treated as Confidential under the terms of
this Protective Order.
6.
No person subject to this Protective Order other than the producing person shall
disclose any of the Discovery Material designated by the producing person as Confidential to any
other person whomsoever, except to:
(a) the Parties to this action, their insurers, and counsel to their insurers;
(b) counsel retained specifically for this action, including any paralegal, clerical
and other assistant employed by such counsel and assigned to this matter;
(c) outside vendors or service providers (such as copy-service providers and
document-management consultants, graphic production services or other litigation support
services) that counsel hire and assign to this matter, including computer service personnel
performing duties in relation to a computerized litigation system;
(d) any mediator or arbitrator that the Parties engage in this matter or that this
Court appoints, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form
annexed as an Exhibit hereto;
(e) as to any document, its author, its addressee, and any other person indicated on
the face of the document as having received a copy;
(f) any witness who counsel for a Party in good faith believes may be called to
testify at trial or deposition in this action, provided such person has first executed a NonDisclosure Agreement in the form annexed as an Exhibit hereto;
(g) any person retained by a Party to serve as an expert witness or otherwise
provide specialized advice to counsel in connection with this action, provided such person has
first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as an Exhibit hereto;
(h) stenographers engaged to transcribe depositions conducted in this action; and
(i) this Court, including any appellate court, and the court reporters and support
personnel for the same.
7.
Prior to any disclosure of any Confidential Discovery Material to any person
referred to in subparagraphs 6(d), 6(f) or 6(g) above, such person shall be provided by counsel
with a copy of this Protective Order and shall sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form
annexed as an Exhibit hereto stating that that person has read this Protective Order and agrees to
be bound by its terms. Said counsel shall retain each signed Non-Disclosure Agreement, hold it
in escrow, and produce it to opposing counsel either prior to such person being permitted to
testify (at deposition or trial) or at the conclusion of the case, whichever comes first.
3

8.
Any Party who objects to any designation of confidentiality or privileged may at
any time prior to the trial of this action serve upon counsel for the designating person a written
notice stating with particularity the grounds of the objection. If the Parties cannot reach
agreement promptly, counsel for all Parties will address their dispute to this Court in accordance
with Paragraph 2(E) of this Court’s Individual Practices in Civil Cases.
9.
Any Party who requests additional limits on disclosure (such as “attorneys’ eyes
only” in extraordinary circumstances) may at any time prior to the trial of this action serve upon
counsel for the receiving Party a written notice stating with particularity the grounds for the
request. If the Parties cannot reach agreement promptly, counsel for all Parties will address their
dispute to this Court in accordance with Paragraph 2(E) of this Court’s Individual Practices in
Civil Cases.
10.
A Party may be requested to produce Discovery Material that is subject to
contractual or other obligations of confidentiality owed to a third party. Within five business
days of receiving the request, the receiving Party subject to such obligation shall inform the third
party of the request and that the third party may seek a protective order or other relief from this
Court. If neither the third party nor the receiving Party seeks a protective order or other relief
from this Court within 21 days of that notice, the receiving Party shall produce the information
responsive to the discovery request but may affix the appropriate controlling designation.
11.
Recipients of Confidential Discovery Material under this Protective Order may
use such material solely for the prosecution and defense of this action and any appeals thereto,
and specifically (and by way of example and not limitations) may not use Confidential Discovery
Material for any business, commercial, or competitive purpose. Nothing contained in this
Protective Order, however, will affect or restrict the rights of any person with respect to its own
documents or information produced in this action. Nor does anything contained in this Protective
Order limit or restrict the rights of any person to use or disclose information or material obtained
independently from and not through or pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
12.
Nothing in this Protective Order will prevent any person subject to it from
producing any Confidential Discovery Material in its possession in response to a lawful
subpoena or other compulsory process, or if required to produce by law or by any government
agency having jurisdiction, provided, however, that such person receiving a request, will provide
written notice to the producing person before disclosure and as soon as reasonably possible, and,
if permitted by the time allowed under the request, at least 10 days before any disclosure. Upon
receiving such notice, the producing person will have the right to oppose compliance with the
subpoena, other compulsory process, or other legal notice if the producing person deems it
appropriate to do so.
13.
All persons seeking to file redacted documents or documents under seal with the
Court shall follow Rule 4(B) of this Court’s Individual Practices in Civil Cases. No person may
file with the Court redacted documents or documents under seal without first seeking leave to
file such papers. All persons producing Confidential Discovery Material are deemed to be on
notice that the Second Circuit puts limitations on the documents or information that may be filed
in redacted form or under seal and that the Court retains discretion not to afford confidential
treatment to any Confidential Discovery Material submitted to the Court or presented in

4

connection with any motion, application or proceeding that may result in an order and/or
decision by the Court unless it is able to make the specific findings required by law in order to
retain the confidential nature of such material. Notwithstanding its designation, there is no
presumption that Confidential Discovery Material will be filed with the Court under seal. The
Parties will use their best efforts to minimize such sealing.
14.
All persons are hereby placed on notice that the Court is unlikely to seal or
otherwise afford confidential treatment to any Discovery Material introduced in evidence at trial
or supporting or refuting any motion for summary judgment, even if such material has previously
been sealed or designated as Confidential.
15.
Any Party filing a motion or any other papers with the Court under seal shall also
publicly file a redacted copy of the same, via the Court’s Electronic Case Filing system, that
redacts only the Confidential Discovery Material itself, and not text that in no material way
reveals the Confidential Discovery Material.
16.
Each person who has access to Discovery Material that has been designated as
Confidential shall take all due precautions to prevent the unauthorized or inadvertent disclosure
of such material. If Confidential information is disclosed to any person other than a person
authorized by this Order, the party responsible for the unauthorized disclosure must immediately
bring all pertinent facts relating to the unauthorized disclosure to the attention of the other parties
and, without prejudice to any rights and remedies of the other parties, make every effort to
prevent further disclosure by the party and by the person(s) receiving the unauthorized
disclosure.
17.
Any Personally Identifying Information (“PII”) (e.g., social security numbers,
financial account numbers, passwords, and information that may be used for identity theft)
exchanged in discovery shall be maintained by the persons who receive such information and are
bound by this Protective Order in a manner that is secure and confidential. In the event that the
person receiving PII experiences a data breach, she, he, or it shall immediately notify the
producing person of the same and cooperate with the producing person to address and remedy
the breach. Nothing herein shall preclude the producing person from asserting legal claims or
constitute a waiver of legal rights or defenses in the event of litigation arising out of the
receiving person’s failure to appropriately protect PII from unauthorized disclosure.
18.
Nothing in this Protective Order shall require disclosure of documents,
electronically stored information (“ESI”), or other information protected from disclosure by the
attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, common interest privilege, or other protection
from discovery (“Privileged Material”). If Privileged Material is nevertheless inadvertently or
unintentionally produced or made available for inspection, such disclosure shall in no way
prejudice or otherwise constitute a waiver or estoppel as to any such privilege, doctrine, right or
work product doctrine, or other ground for withholding production to which the producing party
would otherwise be entitled to assert. Any party that inadvertently produces or makes available
for inspection materials it believes are Privileged Materials may obtain the return of those
materials by promptly notifying the recipient(s) after learning of the inadvertent or unintentional
disclosure and providing a privilege log for the inadvertently or unintentionally produced
documents, information or other material. The recipient(s) shall immediately gather and return

5

all copies of the Privileged Material to the producing party after receiving a request for their
return, except for any pages containing privilege markings by the recipient, which pages shall
instead be destroyed and certified as such by the recipient to the producing party. The recipient
shall also immediately destroy and certify such destruction after receiving a request for return of
inadvertently produced materials all documents or parts thereof summarizing or otherwise
disclosing the content of the inadvertently produced material and shall not use such material for
any purpose. Notwithstanding this provision, outside litigation counsel of record are not required
to delete information that may reside on their respective firm's electronic back-up systems that
are over-written in the normal course of business.
19.
This Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by
Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d), and shall be enforceable and granted full faith and credit in all
other state and federal proceedings by 28 U.S.C § 1738. In the event of a conflict of law, the law
that is most protective of privilege shall apply. This Protective Order shall survive the
termination of the litigation. Within 30 days of the final disposition of this action, all Discovery
Material designated as “Confidential,” and all copies thereof, shall be promptly returned to the
producing person, or, upon permission of the producing person, destroyed.
20.
All persons subject to this Protective Order acknowledge that willful violation of
this Protective Order could subject them to punishment for contempt of Court. This Court shall

6

retain jurisdiction over all persons subject to this Protective Order to the extent necessary to
enforce any obligations arising hereunder or to impose sanctions for any contempt thereof.
SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.
SANDERS LAW GROUP

SILLS CUMMIS & GROSS P.C.

s/ Jaymie Sabilia-Heffert
Jaymie Sabilia-Heffert, Esq.
333 Earle Ovington Blvd, Suite 402
Uniondale, NY 11553
Tel: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

s/ Katherine M. Lieb
Katherine M. Lieb, Esq.
101 Park Avenue, 28th Floor
New York, New York 10178
Tel: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants

Dated: November 25, 2024

Dated: November 25, 2024

SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 26, 2024
New York, New York
JENNIFER L. ROCHON
United States District Judge

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------x
DAVID MCGLYNN,

No. 1:23-cv-11123 (JLR)
Plaintiff,

The Honorable Jennifer L. Rochon
United States District Judge

v.
XCEL BRANDS, INC., and GROUP JS
INTERNATIONAL LTD. D/B/A JS GROUP
INTERNATIONAL,

NON-DISCLOSURE
AGREEMENT

Defendants.
------------------------------------------------------------x
JENNIFER L. ROCHON, United States District Judge:

I, ______________________________, acknowledge that I have read and understand the
Protective Order in this action governing the non-disclosure of those portions of Discovery
Material that have been designated as Confidential. I agree that I will not disclose such
Confidential Discovery Material to anyone other than for purposes of this litigation and that at
the conclusion of the litigation I will either return all discovery information to the party or
attorney from whom I received it, or upon permission of the producing party, destroy such
discovery information. By acknowledging these obligations under the Protective Order, I
understand that I am submitting myself to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for
the Southern District of New York for the purpose of any issue or dispute arising hereunder and
that my willful violation of any term of the Protective Order could subject me to punishment for
contempt of Court.

Dated: