Desarrolladora La Ribera, S. De R.L. De C.V. v. Anderson et al
Filing
97
ORDER: NOW, THEREFORE, for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that Raizada's January 9 motion (Dkt. 94) is GRANTED and plaintiff's claims against Raizada are COMPELLED to arbitration. This action shall otherwise remain stayed pending the arbitration proceedings. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 1/27/2025) (rro)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
1/27/2025
DESARROLLADORA LA RIBERA, S. DE
R.L. DE C.V.,
Plaintiff,
-against-
24-CV-67 (LAK) (BCM)
ORDER
STEVE ANDERSON, et al.,
Defendants.
BARBARA MOSES, United States Magistrate Judge.
WHEREAS, on December 20, 2024, this Court issued an Opinion & Order (Dkt. 93)
which: (i) granted defendant Steve Anderson’s motion to compel arbitration of plaintiff’s
defamation (and related) claims against him; (ii) granted plaintiff’s motion to compel arbitration
of Counterclaims I-IV brought by defendant/counterclaimant Amit Raizada and counterclaimant
TRG CP LLC (TRG); and (iii) stayed all remaining claims and counterclaims in this action pending
arbitration; and
WHEREAS, on January 9, 2025, Raizada – who did not previously move to compel
arbitration – filed a motion (Dkt. 94) to lift the stay for the limited purpose of compelling
arbitration of plaintiff’s defamation (and related) claims against him; and
WHEREAS, plaintiff's claims against Raizada are identical to plaintiff's claims against
Anderson; and
WHEREAS on January 23, 2025, plaintiff filed a statement of non-opposition (Dkt. 96)
regarding Raizada's January 9 motion;
NOW, THEREFORE, for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that Raizada's
January 9 motion (Dkt. 94) is GRANTED and plaintiff's claims against Raizada are COMPELLED
to arbitration.
This action shall otherwise remain stayed pending the arbitration proceedings.
Dated: New York, New York
January 27, 2025
SO ORDERED.
________________________________
BARBARA MOSES
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?