Fosun Pharma USA Inc. v. Todos Medical USA, Inc. et al

Filing 61

ORDER: If Plaintiff seeks a default judgment against Corona Diagnostics LLC on the breach of contract claim, Plaintiff should file supplemental briefing addressing the issue of how the Court could find Corona Diagnostics LLC in default for this cl aim given that Corona Diagnostics LLC does not appear to be a party to the contract. Plaintiff should file this supplemental briefing, if any, by no later than June 6, 2024 at 12:00 p.m. ET. In addition, while the original complaint attached Exhibit A, the contract, see Dkt. No. 1-1, the amended complaint was not filed with the contract attached, see Dkt. No. 27. Plaintiff is directed to refile the contract accordingly. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 6/3/2024) (rro)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------- X : FOSUN PHARMA USA INC., : : Plaintiff, : : -against: : TODOS MEDICAL USA, INC., and CORONA : DIAGNOSTICS LLC, : : Defendants. : : ----------------------------------------------------------------------- X USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: _________________ DATE FILED: 6/3/2024 1:24-cv-115-GHW ORDER GREGORY H. WOODS, District Judge: Plaintiff moved for default judgment on its breach of contract claims against two defendants, Todos Medical USA, Inc. and Corona Diagnostics LLC. See Dkt. No. 56. The contract that Defendants allegedly breached is between Plaintiff and Todos Medical USA, Inc. See Dkt. No. 27 ¶ 13 (“Fosun Pharma entered into a distribution agreement with Defendant Todos Medical.”); see also Ex. A. Corona Diagnostics LLC does not appear to be a party to the contract. If Plaintiff seeks a default judgment against Corona Diagnostics LLC on the breach of contract claim, Plaintiff should file supplemental briefing addressing the issue of how the Court could find Corona Diagnostics LLC in default for this claim given that Corona Diagnostics LLC does not appear to be a party to the contract. Plaintiff should file this supplemental briefing, if any, by no later than June 6, 2024 at 12:00 p.m. ET. In addition, while the original complaint attached Exhibit A, the contract, see Dkt. No. 1-1, the amended complaint was not filed with the contract attached, see Dkt. No. 27. Plaintiff is directed to refile the contract accordingly. SO ORDERED. Dated: June 3, 2024 ___ ____ __ ___ ____ ______ _ __ _____________ _____________________________________ GREG EG E GO OR RY H. WOODS GREGORY Judg United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?