Cordero v. The Table at Redeye Inc. et al

Filing 17

ORDER To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties must discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the Magistrate Judge. If all parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, they must, by June 17, 2024, file on the docket a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Mag istrate Judge form, a copy of which is attached to this Order (and also available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/node/754). If the Court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before the Magistrate Judge rather than be fore the undersigned. Any appeal would be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, as it would be from this Court if the consent form were not signed and so ordered. An information sheet on proceedings before magis trate judges is also attached to this Order. If any party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, by June 17, 2024, advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. There will be no adverse consequences if the parties do not consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other deadlines in this case are adjourned. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Rochon on 6/3/2024) (jca)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
JOSEPH CORDERO,
Plaintiff,
-againstTHE TABLE AT REDEYE INC. et al.,

1:24-cv-00144 (JLR)
ORDER

Defendants.

JENNIFER L. ROCHON, United States District Judge:
On May 31, 2024, the Court-ordered mediator notified the Court that the parties in this
action — brought pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. —
have reached an agreement on all issues. ECF No. 16. Court review and approval of the
settlement is required.
To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster
disposition of this matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties must discuss whether they
are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the
Magistrate Judge. If all parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, they must, by
June 17, 2024, file on the docket a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil
Action to a Magistrate Judge form, a copy of which is attached to this Order (and also available
at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/node/754). If the Court approves that form, all further
proceedings will then be conducted before the Magistrate Judge rather than before the
undersigned. Any appeal would be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the
Second Circuit, as it would be from this Court if the consent form were not signed and so
ordered. An information sheet on proceedings before magistrate judges is also attached to this
Order.

If any party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned
Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, by June 17, 2024, advising the Court that
the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do
not consent. There will be no adverse consequences if the parties do not consent to proceed
before the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other deadlines in this case are adjourned.
Dated: June 3, 2024
New York, New York
SO ORDERED.

JENNIFER L. ROCHON
United States District Judge

AO 85 (Rev. 02/17) Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
__________ District of __________
Plaintiff

v.
Defendant

)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No.

NOTICE, CONSENT, AND REFERENCE OF A CIVIL ACTION TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Notice of a magistrate judge’s availability. A United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct
all proceedings in this civil action (including a jury or nonjury trial) and to order the entry of a final judgment. The judgment
may then be appealed directly to the United States court of appeals like any other judgment of this court. A magistrate judge
may exercise this authority only if all parties voluntarily consent.
You may consent to have your case referred to a magistrate judge, or you may withhold your consent without adverse
substantive consequences. The name of any party withholding consent will not be revealed to any judge who may otherwise
be involved with your case.
Consent to a magistrate judge’s authority. The following parties consent to have a United States magistrate judge
conduct all proceedings in this case including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings.
Printed names of parties and attorneys

Signatures of parties or attorneys

Dates

Reference Order
IT IS ORDERED: This case is referred to a United States magistrate judge to conduct all proceedings and
order the entry of a final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73.

Date:
District Judge’s signature

Printed name and title

Note:

Return this form to the clerk of court only if you are consenting to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States
magistrate judge. Do not return this form to a judge.

Print

Save As...

Reset

United States District Court
Southern District of New York

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGES:
REFERRALS AND CONSENTS
All cases in the Southern District of New York are assigned to two judges: a district
judge and a magistrate judge. District judges are appointed for life terms by the
President. Magistrate judges are selected by a majority vote of the district judges in the
particular district and serve terms of eight years.
Referrals to the Magistrate Judge. The district judge assigned to your case may refer
the case to a magistrate judge for specific purposes. Commonly, the referral will be for
the magistrate judge to conduct the proceedings that occur before trial, such as
resolving discovery disputes or presiding over settlement conferences. A referral may
also be made for the magistrate judge to issue to the district judge a report and
recommendation on how to resolve a motion, such as a motion to dismiss or a motion
for summary judgment. The consent of the parties is not needed for the district judge to
refer the case to the magistrate judge for these purposes. If the district judge has made
such a referral, you can ask the district judge to review any magistrate judge’s decision
by filing an objection with the district judge within fourteen days of that decision. The
district judge will rule on any timely objections that you file. If you do not file an
objection, you will give up your right to challenge the magistrate judge’s decision at a
later time, including on appeal. See Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Consent to Proceed Before the Magistrate Judge. If you would like your case to move
more quickly, it is helpful to consent to proceed before the magistrate judge for all
purposes, including any trial. If all parties consent, the magistrate judge will perform
the identical function that the district judge would have performed. Any trial in your
case would be either a jury or a nonjury trial, depending upon whether there is a right
to a jury trial and a proper request for such a trial. The only difference is that the
magistrate judge – and not the district judge – would preside over that trial. Cases that
proceed for all purposes before a magistrate judge generally move more quickly than
cases before a district judge. If all parties consent to proceed before the magistrate
judge, the district judge plays no further role in the case. Any appeal is taken directly to
the Court of Appeals. It is your choice whether or not to consent to proceed before the
magistrate judge.
A copy of the appropriate consent form is attached. Additional forms are also available
from the Pro Se Intake Unit and on the Court’s website.

C