Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC et al v. Picard
Filing
9
ORDER denying 4 Motion for Leave to Appeal. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Court's February 2, 2024 order in the Related Action, Natixis and Bloom's motion for leave to appeal is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 4 and to close this case. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 5/9/2024) (rro)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------------X
:
In Re BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT :
SECURITIES LLC,
:
Debtor.
:
---------------------------------------------------------------- :
X
NATIXIS FINANCIAL PRODUCTS LLC., et al., :
:
Appellants, :
:
v.
:
:
IRVING H. PICARD,
:
:
Appellee. :
------------------------------------------------------------------X
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #: _________________
DATE FILED: 5/9/2024
1:24-cv-216-GHW
ORDER
GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge:
On January 10, 2024, Natixis Financial Products LLC (“Natixis”) and Bloom Asset Holdings
Fund (“Bloom”) moved for leave to appeal an order from the Bankruptcy Court. Dkt. No. 4. On
February 2, 2024, the Court issued an order denying leave to appeal an order from the Bankruptcy
Court in a related action (the “Related Action”). 24-cv-11, Dkt. No. 9. In that order, the Court
rejected arguments identical to all of the arguments set forth by Natixis and Bloom in their
memorandum of law in support of their motion for leave to appeal. Compare Dkt. No. 4-1 with 24cv-11, Dkt. No. 3-1. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Court’s February 2, 2024 order in the
Related Action, Natixis and Bloom’s motion for leave to appeal is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is
directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 4 and to close this case.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 9, 2024
New York, New York
__________________________________
GREGORY H. WOODS
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?