Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC et al v. Picard

Filing 9

ORDER denying 4 Motion for Leave to Appeal. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Court's February 2, 2024 order in the Related Action, Natixis and Bloom's motion for leave to appeal is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 4 and to close this case. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 5/9/2024) (rro)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------X : In Re BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT : SECURITIES LLC, : Debtor. : ---------------------------------------------------------------- : X NATIXIS FINANCIAL PRODUCTS LLC., et al., : : Appellants, : : v. : : IRVING H. PICARD, : : Appellee. : ------------------------------------------------------------------X USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: _________________ DATE FILED: 5/9/2024 1:24-cv-216-GHW ORDER GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge: On January 10, 2024, Natixis Financial Products LLC (“Natixis”) and Bloom Asset Holdings Fund (“Bloom”) moved for leave to appeal an order from the Bankruptcy Court. Dkt. No. 4. On February 2, 2024, the Court issued an order denying leave to appeal an order from the Bankruptcy Court in a related action (the “Related Action”). 24-cv-11, Dkt. No. 9. In that order, the Court rejected arguments identical to all of the arguments set forth by Natixis and Bloom in their memorandum of law in support of their motion for leave to appeal. Compare Dkt. No. 4-1 with 24cv-11, Dkt. No. 3-1. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Court’s February 2, 2024 order in the Related Action, Natixis and Bloom’s motion for leave to appeal is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 4 and to close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: May 9, 2024 New York, New York __________________________________ GREGORY H. WOODS United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?