Greystone Select Holdings LLC v. Computershare Trust Company, N.A.

Filing 52

ORDER: The Court directs both parties to submit supplemental briefing concerning the interpretation of the definition of "Base Rate" as that term is defined in Schedule A, Paragraph 3 of the indenture agreements, and whether the meanin g of the definition can be resolved at this stage of the litigation. See MAK Tech. Holdings Inc. v. Anyvision Interactive Techs. Ltd., 42 N.Y.3d 570, 2024 WL 3055302 (2024). As applicable, such briefing shall set forth each party's proposed interpretation of the definition. Defendants shall file a brief by February 5, 2025, and Plaintiff may file its response by February 12, 2025, and Defendants may file a reply by February 18, 2025. The initial briefs shall not exceed 1,500 words in length and the reply brief shall not exceed 1,000 words. SO ORDERED. ( Brief due by 2/5/2025., Reply to Response to Brief due by 2/18/2025., Responses to Brief due by 2/12/2025) (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 1/29/2025) (vfr)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GREYSTONE SELECT HOLDINGS, Plaintiff, v. 1:24-CV-00657-LTS WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY, N.A., Defendants. ORDER The Court directs both parties to submit supplemental briefing concerning the interpretation of the definition of “Base Rate” as that term is defined in Schedule A, Paragraph 3 of the indenture agreements,1 and whether the meaning of the definition can be resolved at this stage of the litigation. See MAK Tech. Holdings Inc. v. Anyvision Interactive Techs. Ltd., 42 N.Y.3d 570, 2024 WL 3055302 (2024). As applicable, such briefing shall set forth each party’s proposed interpretation of the definition. Defendants shall file a brief by February 5, 2025, and Plaintiff may file its response by February 12, 2025, and Defendants may file a reply by February 18, 2025. The initial briefs shall not exceed 1,500 words in length and the reply brief shall not exceed 1,000 words. 1 “Base Rate” is defined to “equal the greater of the arithmetic mean of (i) the ‘prime rate’ for dollar denominated loans quoted by leading banks in the City of New York selected by the Calculation Agent and (ii) the Federal Funds Rate (as defined below) plus 0.50% per annum[.]” (Docket entry nos. 10-1, 10-2 at Sched. A, ¶ 3.) GREYSTONE – ORDER VERSION JANUARY 28, 2025 1 SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York January 29, 2025 /s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge GREYSTONE – ORDER VERSION JANUARY 28, 2025 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?