Holley v. Spartan Auto Group, LLC et al

Filing 28

DISMISSAL ORDER The Court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement in principle. (See ECF 27.) Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by August 3, 2024. If no such application is made by that date, today's dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky on 7/3/2024) (jca)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JASMINE HOLLEY, Plain�ff, 24-CV-0844 (RFT) -against- DISMISSAL ORDER SPARTAN AUTO GROUP, LLC, ET AL., Defendants. ROBYN F. TARNOFSKY, United States Magistrate Judge: The Court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement in principle. (See ECF 27.) Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by August 3, 2024. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). DATED: July 3, 2024 New York, New York SO ORDERED. __________________________ ROBYN F. TARNOFSKY United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?