GeekyAnts India Private Limited v. i.am.plus LLC et al

Filing 18

ORDER: On February 7, 2025, the Court ordered plaintiff to file a letter informing the Court about the status of this case and proposed next steps. Dkt. 14. Plaintiff filed a letter indicating that it intended to seek a Clerk's Certificate of Default and asking for two weeks to complete that action. Dkt. 15. The Court granted this request on February 18, 2025. Dkt. 16. Plaintiff then filed a proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default on February 24, 2025, which was rejected by the Clerk's Office on February 25, 2025. Plaintiff has not refiled a proposed certificate. Plaintiff has until March 12, 2025, to obtain a valid Clerk's Certificate of Default. If no certificate is obtained by that time, this case may be dismissed for lack of prosecution. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Arun Subramanian on 3/5/2025) (tg)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GEEKYANTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, Plaintiff, -against- 24-cv-1274 (AS) I.AM.PLUS LLC and R CHANDRASEKAR, ORDER Defendants. ARUN SUBRAMANIAN, United States District Judge: On February 7, 2025, the Court ordered plaintiff to file a letter informing the Court about the status of this case and proposed next steps. Dkt. 14. Plaintiff filed a letter indicating that it intended to seek a Clerk’s Certificate of Default and asking for two weeks to complete that action. Dkt. 15. The Court granted this request on February 18, 2025. Dkt. 16. Plaintiff then filed a proposed Clerk’s Certificate of Default on February 24, 2025, which was rejected by the Clerk’s Office on February 25, 2025. Plaintiff has not refiled a proposed certificate. Plaintiff has until March 12, 2025, to obtain a valid Clerk’s Certificate of Default. If no certificate is obtained by that time, this case may be dismissed for lack of prosecution. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 5, 2025 New York, New York ARUN SUBRAMANIAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?