Bhagat v. Shah
Filing 137
MEMO ENDORSEMENT denying 133 Motion to Quash. ENDORSEMENT The application to quash Plaintiff's subpoenas, which fa lls within the scope of the reference to me, is DENIED. Defendant has provided no authority for the proposition that the poss ibility that Plaintiff will be proceeding prose at some future date requires that subpoenas previously issued by Plaintiff's attorney be quashed. Nor am I aware of any such authority. Plaintiff's emails to the Court, on which Defendant's counsel was copied, were docketed at ECF 132. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate ECF 133. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky on 3/11/2025) (jca)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
