Francis v. City of New York et al

Filing 38

ORDER I am nunc pro tunc extending Plaintiff's deadline to file an opposition to the motion todismiss. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file an opposition by March 21, 2025. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall file their reply, if any, by April 21, 2025. (And as further set forth herein.) SO ORDERED. (Replies due by 4/21/2025., Responses due by 3/21/2025) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky on 3/6/2025) (jca)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
HOPETON K. FRANCIS,
Plaintiff,
-against-

24-CV-2530 (MMG) (RFT)
ORDER

CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.,
Defendants.
ROBYN F. TARNOFSKY, United States Magistrate Judge:

On April 2, 2024, pro se Plaintiff Hopeton K. Francis commenced this action against
Defendants City of New York, Jerome Salmon, and Collette Raspanti (collectively, the
“Defendants”). (See ECF 1.) On September 5, 2024, Defendants moved to dismiss the Complaint
for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (See ECF 19; ECF 20.) Copies of the
motion to dismiss and accompanying memorandum of law were mailed to Plaintiff. (See ECF
21.)
On October 23, 2024, Judge Margaret M. Garnett ordered that Plaintiff had until
December 3, 2024, to file an opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss. (See ECF 23.) On
December 9, 2024, Judge Garnett referred this case to me for general pretrial purposes. (See
ECF 28.) On December 20, 2025, I held a telephonic status conference in this action; at that
conference I extended Plaintiff’s deadline to file an opposition to the motion to dismiss to
February 28, 2025, and I directed Defendants to file a reply, if any, by March 30, 2025. (See ECF
33.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss.