Adstra, LLC v. Kinesso, LLC et al

Filing 43

ORDER denying 41 Motion to Compel. Plaintiff's motion to compel Defendants to produce a 30(b)(6) witness on topics other than topic 6 of Plaintiff's notice of deposition pursuant to order of expedited discovery, see Dkt. No. 41- 2, is DENIED. The Court restricted expedited discovery to "a 30(b)(6) deposition and a limited request for documents into the question of how Acxiom is currently using the Adstra data." Dkt. No. 35 at 23. That issue goes to the critical t hreshold question whetherapart from the meritsPlaintiff is at risk of suffering any irreparable harm. From context, it should be clear that the limitation was intended to cover both the 30(b)(6) deposition and the document request. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 6/3/2024) (ks)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------------- X
:
ADSTRA, LLC,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
-v:
:
KINESSO, LLC and ACXIOM, LLC,
:
:
Defendants.
:
:
---------------------------------------------------------------------- X

6/3/2024

24-cv-2639 (LJL)
ORDER

LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge:
Plaintiff’s motion to compel Defendants to produce a 30(b)(6) witness on topics other
than topic 6 of Plaintiff’s notice of deposition pursuant to order of expedited discovery, see Dkt.
No. 41-2, is DENIED. The Court restricted expedited discovery to “a 30(b)(6) deposition and a
limited request for documents into the question of how Acxiom is currently using the Adstra
data.” Dkt. No. 35 at 23. That issue goes to the critical threshold question whether—apart from
the merits—Plaintiff is at risk of suffering any irreparable harm. From context, it should be clear
that the limitation was intended to cover both the 30(b)(6) deposition and the document request.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 3, 2024
New York, New York

__________________________________
LEWIS J. LIMAN
United States District Judge