DiFalco v. SoulCycle, LLC

Filing 17

ORDER granting 15 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Application GRANTED. All current dates and deadlines, including the Initial Pretrial Conference, are hereby ADJOURNED sine die. It is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall follow the below br iefing schedule: Defendant's consolidated motion to compel arbitration on an individual basis and motion to dismiss shall be due no later than June 21, 2024; Plaintiff's consolidated opposition shall be due no later than July 19, 2024; and Defendant's consolidated reply shall be due no later than August 9, 2024. It is further ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer for at least thirty minutes in a good-faith attempt to settle this action. No later than June 17, 2024, the pa rties shall submit a joint letter confirming the meet-and-confer has occurred (including who participated from each side and whether the meeting was in person, via video, or by phone), and indicating whether both parties believe alternative dispute resolution is viable, including any request to refer this case to mediation or to the Magistrate Judge for a settlement conference. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Margaret M. Garnett on 6/3/2024) (mml)

Download PDF
Application GRANTED. All current dates and deadlines, including the Initial Pretrial Conference, are hereby ADJOURNED sine die. It is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall follow the below briefing schedule: Defendant's consolidated motion to compel arbitration on an individual basis and motion to dismiss shall be due no later than June 21, 2024; Plaintiff's consolidated opposition shall be due no later than July 19, 2024; and Defendant's consolidated reply shall be due no later than August 9, 2024. It is further ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer for at least thirty minutes in a good-faith attempt to settle this action. No later than June 17, 2024, the parties shall submit a joint letter confirming the meet-and-confer has occurred (including who participated from each side and whether the meeting was in person, via video, or by phone), and indicating whether both parties believe alternative dispute resolution is viable, including any request to refer this case to mediation or to the Magistrate Judge for a settlement conference. SO ORDERED. Date: 6/3/2024. HON. MARGARET M. GARNETT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?