Wang v. The Philharmonic-Symphony Society of New York, Inc. et al
Filing
75
ORDER: By February 3, 2025, plaintiffs shall file 1) a copy of the arbitration opinion and award referenced in the complaints and 2) a copy of the individual employment agreement between Wang and the New York Philharmonic. By the same date, the parties should file a joint letter of no more than three pages explaining what, if any, implications plaintiffs' November 2024 dismissal from the Philharmonic has on this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Arun Subramanian on 1/28/2025) (sgz)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
MATTHEW MUCKEY,
Plaintiff,
-againstASSOCIATED MUSICIANS OF GREATER
NEW YORK LOCAL 802, AMERICAN
FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS and THE
PHILHARMONIC-SYMPHONY SOCIETY
OF NEW YORK INC,
24-cv-3348 (AS)
ORDER
Defendants.
LIANG WANG,
Plaintiff,
-againstASSOCIATED MUSICIANS OF GREATER
NEW YORK LOCAL 802, AMERICAN
FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS and THE
PHILHARMONIC-SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF
NEW YORK INC,
24-cv-3356 (AS)
ORDER
Defendants.
ARUN SUBRAMANIAN, United States District Judge:
By February 3, 2025, plaintiffs shall file 1) a copy of the arbitration opinion and award
referenced in the complaints and 2) a copy of the individual employment agreement between Wang
and the New York Philharmonic. By the same date, the parties should file a joint letter of no more
than three pages explaining what, if any, implications plaintiffs’ November 2024 dismissal from
the Philharmonic has on this case.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 28, 2025
New York, New York
ARUN SUBRAMANIAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?