Wang v. The Philharmonic-Symphony Society of New York, Inc. et al

Filing 75

ORDER: By February 3, 2025, plaintiffs shall file 1) a copy of the arbitration opinion and award referenced in the complaints and 2) a copy of the individual employment agreement between Wang and the New York Philharmonic. By the same date, the parties should file a joint letter of no more than three pages explaining what, if any, implications plaintiffs' November 2024 dismissal from the Philharmonic has on this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Arun Subramanian on 1/28/2025) (sgz)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MATTHEW MUCKEY, Plaintiff, -againstASSOCIATED MUSICIANS OF GREATER NEW YORK LOCAL 802, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS and THE PHILHARMONIC-SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NEW YORK INC, 24-cv-3348 (AS) ORDER Defendants. LIANG WANG, Plaintiff, -againstASSOCIATED MUSICIANS OF GREATER NEW YORK LOCAL 802, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS and THE PHILHARMONIC-SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NEW YORK INC, 24-cv-3356 (AS) ORDER Defendants. ARUN SUBRAMANIAN, United States District Judge: By February 3, 2025, plaintiffs shall file 1) a copy of the arbitration opinion and award referenced in the complaints and 2) a copy of the individual employment agreement between Wang and the New York Philharmonic. By the same date, the parties should file a joint letter of no more than three pages explaining what, if any, implications plaintiffs’ November 2024 dismissal from the Philharmonic has on this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 28, 2025 New York, New York ARUN SUBRAMANIAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?