Button et al v. Breshears
Filing
27
ORDER: The Court is in receipt of an email from Defendant sent on October 22, 2024. The Court is docketing the email, attached below, for completeness of the record. The Defendant's deadline to resubmit a Reply with respect to the Motion to Dismiss is HEREBY EXTENDED to November 14, 2024. Parties are directed to file any further questions or notices to the Court on the docket. SO ORDERED. ( Replies due by 11/14/2024.) (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 10/24/2024) (tg)
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 10/24/2024
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
DUSTY BUTTON and MITCHELL TAYLOR
BUTTON,
Plaintiffs,
1:24-cv-03757-MKV
-against-
ORDER
MADISON JANE BRESHEARS,
Defendant.
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge:
The Court is in receipt of an email from Defendant sent on October 22, 2024. The Court
is docketing the email, attached below, for completeness of the record. The Defendant’s deadline
to resubmit a Reply with respect to the Motion to Dismiss is HEREBY EXTENDED to
November 14, 2024. Parties are directed to file any further questions or notices to the Court on
the docket.
SO ORDERED.
Date: October 24, 2024
New York, NY
_________________________________
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL
United States District Judge
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
breshearsmadison@gmail.com
Vyskocil NYSD Chambers
Pro Se Filing
Urgent: Pro Se Defendant Reply (Button et al., v. Breshears, Case No. 1:24-cv-03757-MKV)
Tuesday, October 22, 2024 2:12:14 PM
CAUTION - EXTERNAL:
Your Honor,
I am writing to respectfully request your assistance regarding the status of my Reply in
support of my Motion to Dismiss in this matter. As a pro se defendant, I understand the proper
channels for communication with the Court. However, due to the significant delay in processing my
filing, I felt compelled to reach out directly. On Wednesday, October 9th, I submitted my Reply to
the Pro Se Office via the prescribed method. I received a confirmation of receipt email that same
day. While I have experienced occasional delays in the past, the current wait of eight business days
has become concerning. I am worried that the Court may be unaware of my Reply and proceed with
a ruling in its absence. Despite multiple attempts to contact the Pro Se Office, I have been unable to
obtain a resolution. I managed to speak with a staff-member briefly on Tuesday, October 15th, who
assured me that my filing would be docketed the same day. However, as of today, October 22nd, my
Reply still has not been entered into the court record. Since the 15th, I have received no response to
my follow-up emails, and my attempts to call have resulted in long waits on hold, only for the line to
be disconnected before I have spoken with anyone. I am concerned that my filing may have been
overlooked or lost. I intend to continue my efforts to reach the Pro Se Office, but I believe it is
important to inform the Court of this situation.
Sincerely,
Madison Breshears, Pro Se
718-683-6579
CAUTION - EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated outside the Judiciary. Exercise caution
when opening attachments or clicking on links.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?