Button et al v. Breshears

Filing 27

ORDER: The Court is in receipt of an email from Defendant sent on October 22, 2024. The Court is docketing the email, attached below, for completeness of the record. The Defendant's deadline to resubmit a Reply with respect to the Motion to Dismiss is HEREBY EXTENDED to November 14, 2024. Parties are directed to file any further questions or notices to the Court on the docket. SO ORDERED. ( Replies due by 11/14/2024.) (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 10/24/2024) (tg)

Download PDF
USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 10/24/2024 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DUSTY BUTTON and MITCHELL TAYLOR BUTTON, Plaintiffs, 1:24-cv-03757-MKV -against- ORDER MADISON JANE BRESHEARS, Defendant. MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of an email from Defendant sent on October 22, 2024. The Court is docketing the email, attached below, for completeness of the record. The Defendant’s deadline to resubmit a Reply with respect to the Motion to Dismiss is HEREBY EXTENDED to November 14, 2024. Parties are directed to file any further questions or notices to the Court on the docket. SO ORDERED. Date: October 24, 2024 New York, NY _________________________________ MARY KAY VYSKOCIL United States District Judge From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: breshearsmadison@gmail.com Vyskocil NYSD Chambers Pro Se Filing Urgent: Pro Se Defendant Reply (Button et al., v. Breshears, Case No. 1:24-cv-03757-MKV) Tuesday, October 22, 2024 2:12:14 PM CAUTION - EXTERNAL: Your Honor, I am writing to respectfully request your assistance regarding the status of my Reply in support of my Motion to Dismiss in this matter. As a pro se defendant, I understand the proper channels for communication with the Court. However, due to the significant delay in processing my filing, I felt compelled to reach out directly. On Wednesday, October 9th, I submitted my Reply to the Pro Se Office via the prescribed method. I received a confirmation of receipt email that same day. While I have experienced occasional delays in the past, the current wait of eight business days has become concerning. I am worried that the Court may be unaware of my Reply and proceed with a ruling in its absence. Despite multiple attempts to contact the Pro Se Office, I have been unable to obtain a resolution. I managed to speak with a staff-member briefly on Tuesday, October 15th, who assured me that my filing would be docketed the same day. However, as of today, October 22nd, my Reply still has not been entered into the court record. Since the 15th, I have received no response to my follow-up emails, and my attempts to call have resulted in long waits on hold, only for the line to be disconnected before I have spoken with anyone.  I am concerned that my filing may have been overlooked or lost. I intend to continue my efforts to reach the Pro Se Office, but I believe it is important to inform the Court of this situation. Sincerely, Madison Breshears, Pro Se 718-683-6579 CAUTION - EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated outside the Judiciary. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking on links.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?