Hamilton v. Services Inc. et al

Filing 32

ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Court having been advised on October 17, 2024 that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby DISMISSED and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within sixty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed by the aforementioned deadline; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, requests to extend the deadline to reopen are unlikely to be granted. If the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the set tlement agreement to the Court by the deadline to reopen to be so ordered by the Court. Per Paragraph 9.B of the Court's Individual Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforc e a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are canceled. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Arun Subramanian on 10/23/2024) (jca)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Tammy Hamilton,
Plaintiff,
-against-

24-CV-4533 (AS)

Kings Security Services Inc., Evans Imafidon,
and Carlos Last Name Unknown,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Defendants.

ARUN SUBRAMANIAN, United States District Judge:
The Court having been advised on October 17, 2024 that all claims asserted herein have
been settled, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby DISMISSED and
discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within sixty
days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated.
To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed by the aforementioned deadline; any
application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, requests to extend
the deadline to reopen are unlikely to be granted.
If the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any
settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court by the deadline to
reopen to be “so ordered” by the Court. Per Paragraph 9.B of the Court’s Individual Practices for
Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a
settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.
Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are canceled. The Clerk of Court is
directed to close the case.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 23, 2024
New York, New York

ARUN SUBRAMANIAN
United States District Judge