Hernandez v. Monaghan

Filing 13

ORDER: Under the terms of the Court's August 12, 2024, order at Docket Number 12, the parties were required to submit a joint letter to the Court by August 28, 2024, addressing the following in separate paragraphs, as further set forth h erein. Dkt. 12 at 1-2. By that same date, the parties were also required to submit to the Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order, a template of which is available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-john-p-cronan. Id. at 2. That deadline has passed, and the docket does not reflect the entry of such a joint letter. The Court sua sponte extends the deadline for the joint letter to August 30, 2024. If the parties have not filed a joint letter by that date, the Court will order the parties to appear for a status conference on this matter. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 8/29/2024) (vfr)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------------- X
:
RICKY HERNANDEZ,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
-v:
:
HELEN MONAGHAN,
:
:
Defendant.
:
:
---------------------------------------------------------------------- X

24 Civ. 5924 (JPC)
ORDER

JOHN P. CRONAN, United States District Judge:
Under the terms of the Court’s August 12, 2024, order at Docket Number 12, the parties
were required to submit a joint letter to the Court by August 28, 2024, addressing the following in
separate paragraphs:
(1)

A brief statement of the nature of the action and the principal defenses thereto;

(2)

A brief explanation of why jurisdiction 1 and venue lie in this Court;

(3)

A brief description of all outstanding motions and/or all outstanding requests to file
motions;

(4)

A brief description of any discovery that has already taken place, and that which will
be necessary for the parties to engage in meaningful settlement negotiations;

(5)

A list of all prior settlement discussions, including the date, the parties involved, and
the approximate duration of such discussions, if any;

(6)

The estimated length of trial; and

(7)

Any other information that the parties believe may assist this Court in resolving the
action.

Dkt. 12 at 1-2. By that same date, the parties were also required to submit to the Court a proposed

1

As Plaintiff invokes this Court’s diversity jurisdiction, Dkt. 1 ¶ 7, the parties shall
specifically address whether Plaintiff has adequately alleged the parties’ citizenship. See John
Birch Soc’y v. Nat’l Broad. Co., 377 F.2d 194, 199 (2d Cir. 1967) (“[I]t has long been held that a
statement of residence, unlike domicile, tells the court only where the parties are living and not of
which state they are citizen.”).

case management plan and scheduling order, a template of which is available at
https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-john-p-cronan. Id. at 2. That deadline has passed, and the
docket does not reflect the entry of such a joint letter. The Court sua sponte extends the deadline
for the joint letter to August 30, 2024. If the parties have not filed a joint letter by that date, the
Court will order the parties to appear for a status conference on this matter.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 29, 2024
New York, New York

__________________________________
JOHN P. CRONAN
United States District Judge

2