Nasrany v. The General Consulate of Kuwait in New York City et al

Filing 22

ORDER: Following the October 25, 2024 teleconference attended by both parties, the Court orders the parties to treat the documents filed at Dkt. No. 16 and 20 as constituting one opposition memorandum to the Defendant's motion to dismiss pur suant to FRCP 12 (b)(5). Dkt. No. 8. Accordingly, the Defendant has until November 6, 2024 to submit its reply. Given that Plaintiff, acting pro se, has filed an additional document which has not yet appeared on the docket, the Court gives the Def endant leave to submit a letter to the Court specifying how much time counsel will need to prepare a response, including whether the new filing should be construed as a continuation of Plaintiff's motion to remand, etc., Dkt. No. 13, the respo nse to which is otherwise due on October 29, 2024. Plaintiff will then have two days in which to respond to Defendant's letter. Plaintiff as the pro se party should be advised that there is a Pro Se Law Clinic available to assist unrepresented parties in civil cases. The Clinic may be able to provide a non-incarcerated pro se party with advice in connection with their case. The Pro Se Law Clinic is run by a private organization called the City Bar Justice Center; it is not part of, or r un by, the Court (and, among other things, therefore cannot accept filings on behalf of the Court, which must still be made by any unrepresented party through the Pro Se Intake Unit). For further information regarding the Pro Se Law Clinic, parties are referred to https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/attorney/legal-assistance. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 10/25/2024) ( Responses due by 10/29/2024, Replies due by 11/6/2024.) (ks)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X : BACHIR NASRANY, : : Plaintiff, : : -v: : THE GENERAL CONSULATE OF KUWAIT IN : NEW YORK CITY AND HADI ALSUBAEI, : : Defendant. : X ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 10/25/2024 24-cv-07163 (LJL) ORDER LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: Following the October 25, 2024 teleconference attended by both parties, the Court orders the parties to treat the documents filed at Dkt. No. 16 and 20 as constituting one opposition memorandum to the Defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to FRCP 12 (b)(5). Dkt. No. 8. Accordingly, the Defendant has until November 6, 2024 to submit its reply. Given that Plaintiff, acting pro se, has filed an additional document which has not yet appeared on the docket, the Court gives the Defendant leave to submit a letter to the Court specifying how much time counsel will need to prepare a response, including whether the new filing should be construed as a continuation of Plaintiff’s motion to remand, etc., Dkt. No. 13, the response to which is otherwise due on October 29, 2024. Plaintiff will then have two days in which to respond to Defendant’s letter. Plaintiff as the pro se party should be advised that there is a Pro Se Law Clinic available to assist unrepresented parties in civil cases. The Clinic may be able to provide a non-incarcerated pro se party with advice in connection with their case. The Pro Se Law Clinic is run by a private organization called the City Bar Justice Center; it is not part of, or run by, the Court (and, among other things, therefore cannot accept filings on behalf of the Court, which must still be made by any unrepresented party through the Pro Se Intake Unit). For further information regarding the Pro Se Law Clinic, parties are referred to https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/attorney/legal-assistance. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 25, 2024 New York, New York __________________________________ LEWIS J. LIMAN United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?