Doe v. Combs et al

Filing 57

ORDER: It has come to the Court's attention that Anthony Buzbee, Esq., who signed the Complaint and several other filings on behalf of Plaintiff, see Dkt. 1, 13, 34, has not been admitted to practice in the Southern District of New York. More over, although Mr. Buzbee was warned several weeks ago in a parallel case that this conduct violated Local Civil Rule 1.3, see No. 24-cv-8054 (MKV), Dkt. 47 at 1, he failed to bring this issue to the Court's attention. No later than March 18, 2025, Mr. Buzbee shall file a letter explaining why he failed to notify the Court about this issue earlier and proposing next steps to rectify it. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 3/11/2025) (tg)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN DOE, Plaintiff, v. SEAN COMBS, DADDY’S HOUSE RECORDINGS, INC., CE OPCO, LLC d/b/a Combs Global f/k/a Combs Enterprises LLC, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS, INC., BAD BOY PRODUCTIONS HOLDINGS, INC., BAD BOY BOOKS HOLDINGS, INC., BAD BOY RECORDS LLC, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT LLC, BAD BOY PRODUCTIONS LLC, ORGANIZATIONAL DOES 1–10 and INDIVIDUAL DOES 1–10, No. 24-CV-7973 (RA) ORDER Defendants. RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: It has come to the Court’s attention that Anthony Buzbee, Esq., who signed the Complaint and several other filings on behalf of Plaintiff, see Dkt. 1, 13, 34, has not been admitted to practice in the Southern District of New York. Moreover, although Mr. Buzbee was warned several weeks ago in a parallel case that this conduct violated Local Civil Rule 1.3, see No. 24-cv-8054 (MKV), Dkt. 47 at 1, he failed to bring this issue to the Court’s attention. No later than March 18, 2025, Mr. Buzbee shall file a letter explaining why he failed to notify the Court about this issue earlier and proposing next steps to rectify it. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 11, 2025 New York, New York ________________________________ Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?