Zurita v. 3275 Chicken Corp. et al

Filing 10

ORDER: Defendants were served on December 17 and December 20, 2024. However, no appearance has been entered on Defendants' behalf, and no response to the complaint has been filed in the allotted time. Plaintiff has not moved for a default ju dgment. Plaintiff is directed to notify the Court whether he intends to move for default judgment, or if he has received any communication from Defendants or their counsel regarding a response to the complaint. If Plaintiff fails by March 25, 2025 to either (1) file a letter concerning the status of the case, or (2) move for default judgment against Defendants, the action may be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of this order by mail on Defendants. SO ORDERED. ( Motions due by 3/25/2025.) (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 3/11/2025) (vfr)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
ANGEL ZURITA,
Plaintiff,
24-CV-9364 (JPO)
-vORDER
3275 CHICKEN CORP., et al.,
Defendants.

J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge:
Defendants were served on December 17 and December 20, 2024. However, no
appearance has been entered on Defendants’ behalf, and no response to the complaint has been
filed in the allotted time. Plaintiff has not moved for a default judgment.
Plaintiff is directed to notify the Court whether he intends to move for default judgment,
or if he has received any communication from Defendants or their counsel regarding a response
to the complaint.
If Plaintiff fails by March 25, 2025 to either (1) file a letter concerning the status of the
case, or (2) move for default judgment against Defendants, the action may be dismissed for
failure to prosecute.
Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of this order by mail on Defendants.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 11, 2025
New York, New York
____________________________________
J. PAUL OETKEN
United States District Judge