Doe v. Combs et al

Filing 39

ORDER granting 38 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference The parties' joint request is GRANTED. The March 9, 2025 deadline for the parties to submit a case-management plan and the March 19, 2025 initial pretrial conference are hereby adjourned sine die pending resolution of the Defendants' motion to dismiss. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Rochon on 3/7/2025) (jca)

March 7, 2025
The parties' joint request is GRANTED. The March 9, 2025
deadline for the parties to submit a case-management plan and the
BY ECF
The Honorable Jennifer L. Rochon March 19, 2025 initial pretrial conference are hereby adjourned sine
die pending resolution of the Defendants' motion to dismiss.
United States District Judge
500 Pearl Street
New York, NY 10007
Date: March 7, 2025
New York, New York
Re:
Doe v. Combs, et. al., Case No. 24-cv-09852 (JLR)
Dear Judge Rochon:
We write jointly on behalf of the Plaintiff in this action and defendants Sean Combs,
Daddy’s House Recordings Inc., CE OpCo, LLC d/b/a Combs Global f/k/a Combs
Enterprises, LLC, Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings, Inc., Bad Boy Productions Holdings,
Inc., Bad Boy Books Holdings, Inc., Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, and Bad Boy
Productions LLC (the “Combs Defendants”).
The undersigned parties respectfully request that the Court’s previously ordered
deadline to submit a case management plan, currently scheduled for March 9, 2025, and
initial pretrial conference, currently scheduled for March 19, 2025, be adjourned pending
resolution of the Combs Defendants’ motion to dismiss. See ECF #34.
All parties believe that it will be more efficient to defer discovery pending
resolution of the motion to dismiss. If the motion is successful, it may result in complete
dismissal of this action in its entirety or against certain defendants, which could
significantly alter the scope of discovery that needs to be conducted.
Discovery in this matter is further complicated by the impending criminal trial of
Defendant Sean Combs, which is scheduled to begin before Judge Subramanian on May
5, 2025. See USA v. Combs, Case No. 24-cr-00542 (S.D.N.Y.). The parties agree that it
is impractical to proceed with various aspects of fact discovery involving Mr. Combs
until this criminal trial is concluded. Deferring a case schedule pending the motion to
dismiss will therefore have the added benefit of allowing time for the criminal matter to
conclude.

Hon. Jennifer L. Rochon
March 7, 2025
Page 2 of 2
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Mark Cuccaro
Mark Cuccaro
SHER TREMONTE LLP
90 Broad Street, 23rd Fl.
New York, New York 10004
T: 212.202.2600
[e-mail]
Counsel for the Combs Defendants

/s/ Antigone Curis
Antigone Curis
CURIS LAW, PLLC
52 Duane Street, 7th Fl.
New York, NY 10007
[phone]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe