New York Young Republican Club, Inc. v. Enfants Riches Deprimes, LLC et al
Filing
14
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE On January 27, 2025, the parties in this case filed a stipulation stating that Defendants have accepted service of process. Dkt. No. 13. The stipulation also contained an agreement by the parties to extend the deadline for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. The parties did not request that the Court take any action with respect to the stipulation. Therefore, the Court is not taking any action with respect to the stipulation at this time. However, the Court notes that the parties stipulation is not effective to extend the deadline for the defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint without Court approval. Any application to extend that deadline should be mad e in accordance with the Courts Individual Rulesof Practice in Civil Cases. The Court observes that no lawyer has entered a notice of appearance forDefendants; the Court does not expect to consider a request that has not been filed by counsel of record for Defendants. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 1/29/2025) (jca)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------------------------------------------X
:
NEW YORK YOUNG REPUBLICAN
:
CLUB, INC.,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
-against:
:
ENFANTS RICHES DÉPRIMÉS, LLC, et al.,
:
:
Defendants.
:
:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------X
GREGORY H. WOODS, District Judge:
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #: _________________
DATE FILED: 1/29/2025
1:24-cv-9872-GHW
NOTICE OF INITIAL
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
On January 27, 2025, the parties in this case filed a stipulation stating that Defendants have
accepted service of process. Dkt. No. 13. The stipulation also contained an agreement by the
parties to extend the deadline for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. The
parties did not request that the Court take any action with respect to the stipulation. Therefore, the
Court is not taking any action with respect to the stipulation at this time.
However, the Court notes that the parties’ stipulation is not effective to extend the deadline
for the defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint without Court approval. Any
application to extend that deadline should be made in accordance with the Court’s Individual Rules
of Practice in Civil Cases. The Court observes that no lawyer has entered a notice of appearance for
Defendants; the Court does not expect to consider a request that has not been filed by counsel of
record for Defendants.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 29, 2025
New York, New York
_____________________________________
GREGORY H. WOODS
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?