In Re: APPLICATION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1782 TO TAKE DISCOVERY FROM BROOKFIELD INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS L.P., BROOKFIELD ASSET MANAGEMENT LTD., BROOKFIELD CORPORATION, CAHILL GORDON & REINDEL LLP, KPMG LLP, THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, SCOTIA CAPITAL (USA)

Filing 11

ORDER: Upon consideration of Applicant's Motion to Exceed Page Limit in its memorandum of law in support of its application to obtain discovery pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 (the "Application"), and after finding good cause, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Motion to Exceed Page Limit is GRANTED; and 2. The Applicant is authorized to file its memorandum of law in support of its Application under 28 U.S.C. § 1782 in the form attached as Exhibit A to its Motion.IT IS SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 11/22/2024) (ks)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE : APPLICATION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1782 TO TAKE DISCOVERY FROM BROOKFIELD INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS L.P., BROOKFIELD ASSET MANAGEMENT LTD., BROOKFIELD CORPORATION, CAHILL GORDON & REINDEL LLP, KPMG LLP, THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, SCOTIA CAPITAL (USA) INC., SCOTIA HOLDINGS (USA) LLC, ARUP LATIN AMERICA S.A., ARUP AMERICAS, INC., CITIBANK, N.A., WELLS FARGO, N.A., JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., THE CLEARING HOUSE PAYMENTS COMPANY L.L.C., AND THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK Case No. 1:24-mc-00533 ORDER Upon consideration of Applicant’s Motion to Exceed Page Limit in its memorandum of law in support of its application to obtain discovery pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 (the “Application”), and after finding good cause, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Motion to Exceed Page Limit is GRANTED; and 2. The Applicant is authorized to file its memorandum of law in support of its Application under 28 U.S.C. § 1782 in the form attached as Exhibit A to its Motion. IT IS SO ORDERED November 22, 2024 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?