Rayner v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
Filing
6
ORDER OF SERVICE: The Clerk of Court is directed to issue summonses as to Defendants Pfizer, Inc. and Michelle R. Nash. Plaintiff is directed to serve the summons and complaint on each Defendant within 90 days of the issuance of the summonses. If within those 90 days, Plaintiff has not either served Defendants or requested an extension of time to do so, the Court may dismiss the claims against Defendants under Rules 4 and 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff may receive court documents by email by completing the attached form, Consent to Electronic Service. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 3/6/2025) (sgz) Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing.
Case 1:25-cv-00803-GHW
Document 6
U NI T E D S T A T E S DI S T RI C T C O U R T
S O U T H E R N DI S T RI C T O F N E W Y O R K
Filed 03/06/25 Page 1 of 2
US D C S D N Y
USDC
D O C USDNY
ME NT
DOCUMENT
EELECTRONICALLY
L E C T R O NI C A L LFILED
Y FI L E D
DDOC
O C #:#:
D A T E FILED:
FI L E D: 3 / 6 / 2 5
DATE
F R A N C ES R A Y N E R ,
Pl ai ntiff,
-a g ai nst P FI Z E R, I N C. , a n d MI C H E L L E R. N A S H ,
2 5 -c v -8 0 3 -G H W
O R D E R O F S E R VI C E
D ef e n d a nts.
G R E G O R Y H. W O O D S , U nit e d St at es Distri ct J u d g e:
Pl ai ntiff, w h o is pr o c e e di n g pro se , p ai d t h e fili n g f e es t o c o m m e n c e t his a cti o n.
T h e Cl er k of C o urt is dir e ct e d t o iss u e s u m m o ns es as t o D ef e n d a nts Pfi z er, I n c. a n d
Mi c h ell e R. N as h . Pl ai ntiff is dir e ct e d t o s er ve t h e s u m m o ns a n d c o m pl ai nt o n e a c h D ef e n d a nt
wit hi n 9 0 d a ys of t h e iss u a n c e of t h e s u m m o ns es.1
If wit hi n t h os e 9 0 d a ys, Pl ai ntiff h as n ot eit h er s er ve d D ef e n d a nts or r e q u est e d a n e xt e nsi o n
of ti m e t o d o s o, t h e C o urt m ay dis miss t h e cl ai ms a g ai nst D ef e n d a nts u n d er R ul es 4 a n d 4 1 of t h e
Fe d er al R ul es of Ci vil Pr o c e d ur e f or f ail ur e t o pr os e c ut e.
Alt h o u g h R ul e 4( m) of t h e Fe d er al R ul es of Ci vil Pr o c e d ur e g e n er all y r e q uir es t h at a s u m m o ns b e
s er ve d wit hi n 9 0 d a ys of t h e d at e t h e c o m pl ai nt is fil e d, t h e s u m m o ns i n t his c as e was n ot iss u e d
w h e n Pl ai ntiff fil e d t h e c o m pl ai nt b e c a us e h e h a d n ot p ai d t h e fili n g f e e. T h e C o urt t h er ef or e
e xt e n ds t h e ti m e t o s er ve u ntil 9 0 d a ys aft er t h e d at e t h e s u m m o ns is iss u e d.
1
Case 1:25-cv-00803-GHW
Document 6
Filed 03/06/25
Page 2 of 2
Pl ai ntiff m ay r e c ei ve c o urt d o c u m e nts b y e m ail b y c o m pl eti n g t h e att a c h e d f or m, C o ns e nt t o
El e ctr o ni c S er vi c e .2
S O O R D E R E D.
D at e d:
M ar c h 6, 2 0 2 5
N e w Y or k , N e w Y or k
G R E G O R Y H. W O O D S
U nit e d St at es Distri ct J u d g e
If Pl ai ntiff c o ns e nts t o r e c ei ve d o c u m e nts by e m ail, Pl ai ntiff will n o l o n g er r e c ei ve c o urt
d o c u m e nts b y r e g ul ar m ail.
2
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?