Joao v. Epic Systems Corporation

Filing 31

ORDER granting 26 Letter Motion to Seal. The motion to seal is granted temporarily. That said, mere agreement between the parties to keep a document confidential is not sufficient to keep a judicial document sealed or redacted. See, e.g., United S tates v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A., No. 12-CV-7527 (JMF), 2015 WL 3999074, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. June 30, 2015) (citing cases). Thus, if any party believes that the materials at issue should remain sealed or redacted, that party shall file a letter brief, with in three days and not to exceed three pages, showing why doing so is consistent with the presumption in favor of public access to judicial documents. See generally Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 26. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 3/5/2025) (jjc)

Download PDF
Quarles & Brady LLP Attorneys at Law 33 East Main Street Suite 900 Madison, Wisconsin 53703 608?251?5000 Fax 608?251?9166 quarles.com Writer's Direct Dial: 608?283?2608 E?Mail: Bryce.Loken@quarles.com March 4, 2025 VIA CM/ECF The Honorable Jesse M. Furman United States District Court Southern District of New York 40 Centre Street, Room 2202 New York, NY 10007 RE: Raymond A. Joao v. Epic Systems Corporation, Case No. 1:25-cv-00857-JMF Letter Motion for Leave to File Document in Redacted Form Dear Judge Furman: In accordance with Rule 7.C. of the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases, Standing Order 19-MC-583, and Section 6 of the S.D.N.Y. Electronic Case Filing Rules and Instructions, Defendant Epic Systems Corporation respectfully seeks leave to file in redacted form (1) Epic’s Reply in Support of Motion to Transfer; and (2) Exhibit A to the Declaration of Bryce A. Loken in Support of Epic’s Reply. The information Epic seeks to redact from its Reply Brief and Exhibit A contain testimony from the February 25, 2025 deposition of Raymond A. Joao, taken in connection with Epic Sys. Corp. v. Decapolis Systems, LLC, Case No. 9:22-cv-80173 (S.D. Fla.). Pursuant to Rule 7.C.i. of the Court’s Individual Rules, Epic conferred with Plaintiff Joao concerning Epic’s intention to cite to and file portions of the transcript. Plaintiff Joao has designated 277:18–278:9 and 280:19– 281:17 as RESTRICTED-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY and 279:22–280:12 as CONFIDENTIAL pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order entered in the Florida action, a copy of which is enclosed. On February 28, 2025, pursuant to Rule 7.C.i., the undersigned counsel informed Plaintiff Joao’s counsel of the Court’s requirement that Plaintiff file, within three business days, a letter explaining the need to seal or redact the aforementioned testimony. Chicago • Denver • Indianapolis • Madison • Milwaukee • Minneapolis • Naples • Phoenix • St. Louis • San Diego • Tampa • Tucson • Washington, D.C. The Honorable Jesse M. Furman March 4, 2025 Page 2 We thank the Court for its attention to this matter and are happy to address any questions the Court may have. The motion to seal is granted temporarily. That said, mere agreement between the parties to keep a document confidential is not sufficient to keep a “judicial document” sealed or redacted. See, e.g., United States v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A., No. 12-CV-7527 (JMF), 2015 WL 3999074, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. June 30, 2015) (citing cases). Thus, if any party believes that the materials at issue should remain sealed or redacted, that party shall file a letter brief, within three days and not to exceed three pages, showing why doing so is consistent with the presumption in favor of public access to judicial documents. See generally Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 26. SO ORDERED. March 5, 2025 Respectfully submitted, Bryce A. Loken (Pro hac vice) Kristin Graham Noel (Pro hac vice) Matthew J. Duchemin (Pro hac vice) QUARLES & BRADY LLP 33 East Main Street, Suite 900 Madison, WI 53703 Tel.: (608) 251-5000 kristin.noel@quarles.com matthew.duchemin@quarles.com bryce.loken@quarles.com Mitchell D. Cohen VEDDERPRICE 1633 Broadway, 31st Floor New York, NY 10019 Tel.: (212) 407-6980 mcohen@vedderprice.com Attorneys for Defendant [Enclosure] QB\166755.00817\95053958.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?