Carrasquillo v. Superintendent

Filing 4

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Accordingly, the petition is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefor e IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment in this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/10/2025) (sgz) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
SHAKUR CARRASQUILLO,
Petitioner,
25-CV-1030 (LTS)

-against-

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

SUPERINTENDENT, WENDE
CORRECTIONAL FACILITY,
Respondent.

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge:
By order dated February 5, 2025, the Court directed Petitioner, within thirty days, to
submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP application”) or pay the $5.00 in
fees required to file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in this court.
That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal without prejudice of the
petition. Petitioner has not filed an IFP application or paid the filing fee. Accordingly, the
petition is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.
The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would
not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf.
Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates
good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).
The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment in this case.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:

March 10, 2025
New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN
Chief United States District Judge