Valencia v. Col. Littleton Properties, LLC
Filing
8
ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Court having been advised at Dkt. 7 that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby DISMISSED and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within sixty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed by May 11, 2025; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied sole ly on that basis. Further, requests to extend the deadline to reopen are unlikely to be granted. If the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreem ent to the Court by the deadline to reopen to be "so ordered" by the Court. Per Paragraph 4(C) of the Courts Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enf orce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are cancelled. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Rochon on 3/12/2025) (jca)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
JUSTIN VALENCIA, on behalf of himself and
all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 1:25-cv-01462 (JLR)
-against-
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
COL. LITLETON PROPERTIES, LLC,
Defendant.
JENNIFER L. ROCHON, United States District Judge:
The Court having been advised at Dkt. 7 that all claims asserted herein have been settled
in principle, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby DISMISSED and
discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within sixty
days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated.
To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed by May 11, 2025; any application to
reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, requests to extend the
deadline to reopen are unlikely to be granted.
If the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any
settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court by the deadline to
reopen to be “so ordered” by the Court. Per Paragraph 4(C) of the Court’s Individual Rules and
Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction
to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.
Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are cancelled. The Clerk of Court is
directed to CLOSE the case.
Dated: March 12, 2025
New York, New York
SO ORDERED.
JENNIFER L. ROCHON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?