BRADY et al v. 102 E. 238th STREET LLC

Filing 8

ORDER: The Court ordered defendant to explain, by March 7, 2025, why the case should not be remanded based on the forum-defendant rule. If no explanation was given by that date, the Court warned, the case would be remanded without further notice. Dk t. 6. No such explanation has been provided to the Court. As a courtesy, the Court extends the deadline, nunc pro tunc, until March 14, 2025 at 5:00 PM. If defendant does not respond by this deadline, the case will be remanded. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Arun Subramanian on 3/11/2025) (sgz)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Maureen Brady and Martin Brady, Plaintiffs, 25-CV-1483 (AS) -against- ORDER 102 E. 238th Street, LLC, Defendant. ARUN SUBRAMANIAN, United States District Judge: The Court ordered defendant to explain, by March 7, 2025, why the case should not be remanded based on the forum-defendant rule. If no explanation was given by that date, the Court warned, the case would be remanded without further notice. Dkt. 6. No such explanation has been provided to the Court. As a courtesy, the Court extends the deadline, nunc pro tunc, until March 14, 2025 at 5:00 PM. If defendant does not respond by this deadline, the case will be remanded. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 11, 2025 New York, New York ARUN SUBRAMANIAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?