Hazlett v. Gutman, Mintz, Baker & Sonnenfeldt, LLP
Filing
7
ORDER granting 6 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File Application GRANTED. Defendant shall respond to the complaint by April 9, 2025. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 6. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jennifer H. Rearden on 3/6/2025) (jca)
WWW.RIVKINRADLER.COM
926 RXR Plaza
Uniondale, NY 11556-0926
T 516.357.3000 F 516.357.3333
KENNETH A. NOVIKOFF
Application GRANTED. Defendant shall
respond to the complaint by April 9, 2025.
PARTNER
(516) 357-3110
ken.novikoff@rivkin.com
March 6, 2025
SO ORDERED.
VIA ECF
Jennifer H. Rearden, U.S.D.J.
Dated: March 6, 2025
Honorable Jennifer H. Rearden
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
500 Pearl Street, Courtroom 1010
New York, New York 10007
Re:
The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF
No. 6.
John Hazlett v. Gutman, Mintz, Baker & Sonnenfeldt, LLP.
Case No. 1:25-cv-01558
Your Honor:
Rivkin, Radler LLP represents Defendant Gutman, Mintz, Baker & Sonnenfeldt, LLP,
(“Gutman”), in the above referenced action. This action was removed to the Southern District of New
York on February 24, 2025. The parties have agreed that service was deemed effectuated on February
24, 2025, and Gutman agrees not to challenge service of process at any point in this case.
Accordingly, Gutman’s time to file its responsive pleading is presently March 24, 2025.
Gutman moves for a two-week extension of time, until April 9, 2025, in which to file its responsive
pleading. Plaintiff’s counsel consents. This is Gutman’s first request for such relief.
Respectfully Submitted,
RIVKIN RADLER, LLP
Kenneth A. Novikoff
Kenneth A. Novikoff
66 South Pearl Street, 11th Floor
Albany, NY 12207-1533
T 518.462.3000 F 518.462.4199
25 Main Street
Court Plaza North, Suite 501
Hackensack, NJ 07601-7082
T 201.287.2460 F 201.489.0495
477 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10022-5843
T 212.455.9555 F 212.687.9044
2649 South Road
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601-6843
T 845.473 8100 F 845.473.8777
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?