Jones v. Rebel Rags, LLC
Filing
5
ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of service of the summons and complaint, the parties must meet and confer for at least one hour in a good-faith attempt to settle this action. In their discussions, the parties should consi der whether plaintiff has satisfied the threshold requirement of standing. See, e.g., Calcano v. Swarovski N. Am. Ltd., 36 F.4th 68, 77-78 (2d Cir. 2022); Harty v. W. Point Realty, Inc., 28 F.4th 435, 443-44 (2d Cir. 2022). To the extent the partie s are unable to settle the case themselves, they must also discuss whether further settlement discussions through the district's court-annexed mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive at this time. IT IS FURTHER ORDER ED that within fifteen (15) additional days (i.e., within forty-five (45)days of service of the summons and complaint), the parties must submit a joint letter informing the Court whether the parties have settled. If the parties do not reach a sett lement, the parties shall in the joint letter request that the Court (1) refer the case to mediation or a magistrate judge for a settlement conference (and indicate a preference between the two options), or (2) proceed with an initial status conference. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Rochon on 3/7/2025) (jca)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
CLAY LEE JONES, on behalf of himself and
all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 1:25-cv-01841 (JLR)
-against-
ORDER
REBEL RAGS, LLC,
Defendant.
JENNIFER L. ROCHON, United States District Judge:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of service of the summons and
complaint, the parties must meet and confer for at least one hour in a good-faith attempt to settle
this action. In their discussions, the parties should consider whether plaintiff has satisfied the
threshold requirement of standing. See, e.g., Calcano v. Swarovski N. Am. Ltd., 36 F.4th 68, 77–78
(2d Cir. 2022); Harty v. W. Point Realty, Inc., 28 F.4th 435, 443–44 (2d Cir. 2022). To the extent
the parties are unable to settle the case themselves, they must also discuss whether further
settlement discussions through the district’s court-annexed mediation program or before a
magistrate judge would be productive at this time.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within fifteen (15) additional days (i.e., within forty-five
(45) days of service of the summons and complaint), the parties must submit a joint letter informing
the Court whether the parties have settled. If the parties do not reach a settlement, the parties shall
in the joint letter request that the Court (1) refer the case to mediation or a magistrate judge for a
settlement conference (and indicate a preference between the two options), or (2) proceed with an
initial status conference.
Dated: March 7, 2025
New York, New York
SO ORDERED.
JENNIFER L. ROCHON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?